Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488979›Full record

ReviewJournal of stroke2016

Neural Stem Cells and Ischemic Brain.

Zhenggang Zhang, Michael Chopp

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of stroke, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenggang ZhangHenry Ford Hospital, Michigan, United States.
Michael ChoppHenry Ford Hospital, Michigan, United States.
Henry Ford Hospital · USMichigan United · US

Funding

miR-17-92 exosome treatment of strokeR01NS088656 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHOPP, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Ac-SDKP for Treatment of Acute StrokeR01NS079612 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHANG, ZHENG GANG · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
MicroRNAs and neurogenesis after strokeR01NS075156 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHANG, ZHENG GANG · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075156NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079612NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke activates neural stem cells in the ventricular-subventricular zone (V/SVZ) of the lateral ventricle, which increases neuroblasts and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs). Within the ischemic brain, neural stem cells, neuroblasts and OPCs appear to actively communicate with cerebral endothelial cells and other brain parenchymal cells to mediate ischemic brain repair; however, stroke-induced neurogenesis unlikely plays any significant roles in neuronal replacement. In this mini-review, we will discuss recent findings how intercellular communications between stroke-induced neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis and brain parenchymal cells could potentially facilitate brain repair processes.

Indexed as

Adult neurogenesisBrain repairStem cellsStroke

Identifiers

PMID27488979
PMCPMC5066435
OpenAlexW2498829057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.