Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488965›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2016

Short cervix detection in pregnant women by transabdominal sonography with post-void technique.

Kiattisak Kongwattanakul, Piyamas Saksiriwuttho, Ratana Komwilaisak, Pisake Lumbiganon

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiattisak KongwattanakulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. kiattisak@kku.ac.th.
Piyamas SaksiriwutthoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Ratana KomwilaisakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Pisake LumbiganonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Khon Kaen University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic properties of transabdominal sonography with the post-void technique for cervical length measurement.

methodsThis study was a prospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria were pregnant women aged 18-40 years with gestational age of 18-23 completed weeks. Transabdominal sonography with vertical bladder depth of less than 5 cm and transvaginal cervical length measurements were carried out by a single experienced sonographer.

resultsThere were 307 eligible pregnant women. The mean age of all subjects was 29.0 years. The mean cervical length obtained through transabdominal and transvaginal measurement was 3.33 and 3.47 cm, respectively. Ten patients (3.3 %) were identified as having a short cervix using transvaginal sonography, and 12 patients (3.9 %) were identified using transabdominal sonography.

conclusionTransabdominal sonography with vertical bladder depth of less than 5 cm performed better compared with transvaginal sonography. It may not be necessary to perform transvaginal sonography if transabdominal sonography reveals the cervical length to be more than 2.5 cm.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCervical Length MeasurementCervix UteriFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondProspective StudiesYoung AdultCervical lengthPreterm birthScreeningShort cervix

Identifiers

PMID27488965
OpenAlexW2492948150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.