Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488876›Full record

Trial reportCancer research and treatment2017

Feasibility and Efficacy of Eribulin Mesilate in Korean Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Korean Multi-center Phase IV Clinical Study Results.

Yeon Hee Park, Tae Yong Kim, Young-Hyuck Im, Keun-Seok Lee, In Hae Park, Joohyuk Sohn, Soo-Hyeon Lee, Seock-Ah Im, Jee Hyun Kim, Se Hyun Kim and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Yeon Hee ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Yong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Hyuck ImDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Keun-Seok LeeDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
In Hae ParkDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Joohyuk SohnDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Soo-Hyeon LeeDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seock-Ah ImDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jee Hyun KimDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Se Hyun KimDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Soo Jung LeeDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Su-Jin KohDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
Ki Hyeong LeeDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
Yoon Ji ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Kyung ChoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Suee LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
Seok Yun KangDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Jae Hong SeoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung-Bae KimDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Hae JungDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei University · KRUlsan College · KRChungbuk National University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRAjou University · KRGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRNational Cancer Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEribulin mesilate was approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC), who had received at least two chemotherapeutic regimens, including anthracycline and taxane. On the other hand, the efficacy and safety information of eribulin in Korean patients is limited by the lack of clinical trials. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase IV study, locally advanced or MBC patients were enrolled between June 2013 and April 2014 from 14 centers in Korea. One point four mg/m

resultsA total of 101 patients received at least one dose of eribulin and were included in the safety set. The patients received a total of 543 treatment cycles, with a median of three cycles (range, 1 to 31 cycles). The most common adverse event was neutropenia (91.1% of patients, 48.3% of cycles). The frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, decrease in appetite, fatigue/asthenia, and myalgia/arthralgia. The peripheral neuropathy of any grade occurred in 27 patients (26.7%), including grade 3 in two patients. Disease control rate was 52.7% and 51.3% of patients in the full analysis set and per-protocol set, respectively.

conclusionThis study demonstrated the feasible safety profile and activity of eribulin in Korean patients with MBC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFuransHumansKetonesMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPolyether PolyketidesRepublic of KoreaRetreatmentAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumoreribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesBreast neoplasmsEribulinKoreanMetastasisPhase IV clinical trialSafety

Identifiers

PMID27488876
PMCPMC5398406
OpenAlexW2491703090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.