Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488871›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2017

Induction of Apoptosis in Intestinal Toxicity to a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor in a Phase I Study with Pelvic Radiotherapy.

Erta Kalanxhi, Karianne Risberg, Imon S Barua, Svein Dueland, Stein Waagene, Solveig Norheim Andersen, Solveig J Pettersen, Jessica M Lindvall, Kathrine Røe Redalen, Kjersti Flatmark and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. RadiosensitizationMolecular cancer therapeutics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erta KalanxhiDepartment of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Karianne RisbergDepartment of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Imon S BaruaInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Svein DuelandDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Stein WaageneDepartment of Tumour Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Solveig Norheim AndersenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Solveig J PettersenDepartment of Tumour Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jessica M LindvallInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Kathrine Røe RedalenDepartment of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Kjersti FlatmarkInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Hansen ReeDepartment of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Akershus University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhen integrating molecularly targeted compounds in radiotherapy, synergistic effects of the systemic agent and radiation may extend the limits of patient tolerance, increasing the demand for understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of treatment toxicity. In this Pelvic Radiation and Vorinostat (PRAVO) study, we investigated mechanisms of adverse effects in response to the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) when administered as a potential radiosensitiser. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis phase I study for advanced gastrointestinal carcinoma was conducted in sequential patient cohorts exposed to escalating doses of vorinostat combined with standard-fractionated palliative radiotherapy to pelvic target volumes. Gene expression microarray analysis of the study patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was followed by functional validation in cultured cell lines and mice treated with SAHA.

resultsPBMC transcriptional responses to vorinostat, including induction of apoptosis, were confined to the patient cohort reporting dose-limiting intestinal toxicities. At relevant SAHA concentrations, apoptotic features (annexin V staining and caspase 3/7 activation, but not poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase cleavage) were observed in cultured intestinal epithelial cells. Moreover, SAHA-treated mice displayed significant weight loss.

conclusionThe PRAVO study design implemented a strategy to explore treatment toxicity caused by an HDAC inhibitor when combined with radiotherapy and enabled the identification of apoptosis as a potential mechanism responsible for the dose-limiting effects of vorinostat. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report deciphering mechanisms of normal tissue adverse effects in response to an HDAC inhibitor within a combined-modality treatment regimen.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiomarkersCell LineClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsIntestinal MucosaAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsVorinostatApoptosisDrug-related side effects and adverse reactionsHistone deacetylase inhibitorsPhase I Clinical TrialsRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27488871
PMCPMC5398387
OpenAlexW2483041877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.