Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488838›Full record

ArticleAge (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2016

Effects of aging on the relationship between cognitive demand and step variability during dual-task walking.

Leslie M Decker, Fabien Cignetti, Nathaniel Hunt, Jane F Potter, Nicholas Stergiou, Stephanie A Studenski

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Step width variability as a discriminator of age-related gait changes.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Aging in motion: how age and age simulation shape dual-task walking and memory.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leslie M DeckerUMR-S 1075 COMETE (Mobilités: Attention, Orientation, Chronobiologie) INSERM and Université de Caen Normandie, Pôle des Formations et de Recherche en Santé, 2 rue des Rochambelles, 14032, Caen Cedex 5, France. leslie.decker@unicaen.fr.
Fabien CignettiUMR 7291 CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, 3 place Victor-Hugo, 13331, Marseille Cedex 3, France.
Nathaniel HuntDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 3040 Valley Life Sciences Building #3140, Berkeley, CA, 94720-3140, USA.
Jane F PotterDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986155 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-6155, USA.
Nicholas StergiouUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha, Biomechanics Research Building, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE, 68182-0860, USA.
Stephanie A StudenskiTranslational Gerontology Branch, Longitudinal Studies Section, National Institute on Aging, 251 Bayview Blvd., Suite 100, Rm 04B316, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.

Funding

Visual control of locomotion in people with Parkinsons diseaseP20GM109090 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI DOTOV, DOBROMIR · 2014 to 2023
$20.5M
Effects of cognitive challenge on gait control in elderly fallersK99AG033684 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI DECKER, LESLIE M · 2010 to 2010
$81k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG033684NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A U-shaped relationship between cognitive demand and gait control may exist in dual-task situations, reflecting opposing effects of external focus of attention and attentional resource competition. The purpose of the study was twofold: to examine whether gait control, as evaluated from step-to-step variability, is related to cognitive task difficulty in a U-shaped manner and to determine whether age modifies this relationship. Young and older adults walked on a treadmill without attentional requirement and while performing a dichotic listening task under three attention conditions: non-forced (NF), forced-right (FR), and forced-left (FL). The conditions increased in their attentional demand and requirement for inhibitory control. Gait control was evaluated by the variability of step parameters related to balance control (step width) and rhythmic stepping pattern (step length and step time). A U-shaped relationship was found for step width variability in both young and older adults and for step time variability in older adults only. Cognitive performance during dual tasking was maintained in both young and older adults. The U-shaped relationship, which presumably results from a trade-off between an external focus of attention and competition for attentional resources, implies that higher-level cognitive processes are involved in walking in young and older adults. Specifically, while these processes are initially involved only in the control of (lateral) balance during gait, they become necessary for the control of (fore-aft) rhythmic stepping pattern in older adults, suggesting that attentional resources turn out to be needed in all facets of walking with aging. Finally, despite the cognitive resources required by walking, both young and older adults spontaneously adopted a "posture second" strategy, prioritizing the cognitive task over the gait task.

Indexed as

CognitionGaitAdultAgedAgingHumansWalk TestYoung AdultAgingCognitive controlGaitResource competitionStep variability

Identifiers

PMID27488838
PMCPMC5061669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.