ArticleCurrent genetics2017
Plastid phylogenomic study of species within the genus Zea: rates and patterns of three classes of microstructural changes.
Article in Current genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analyses of three complete Primula mitogenomes with insights into mitogenome size variation in Ericales.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Phylogenomic Analysis of the Plastid Genome of the Peruvian Purple MaizePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Plastome genomics in South American maize landraces: chloroplast lineages parallel the geographical structuring of nuclear gene pools.Annals of botany · 2021Article
- Dates and rates in grape's plastomes: evolution in slow motion.Current genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Investigation of mitochondrial-derived plastome sequences in the Paspalum lineage (Panicoideae; Poaceae).BMC plant biology · 2018Article
- A 250 plastome phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae): topological support under different data partitions.PeerJ · 2018Article
- Phylogenomics and Plastome Evolution of Tropical Forest Grasses (Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This project examines the relationships within the genus Zea using complete plastid genomes (plastomes). While Zea mays has been well studied, congeneric species have yet to be as thoroughly examined. For this study four complete plastomes and a fifth nearly complete plastome were sequenced in the five species (Zea diploperennis, Zea perennis, Zea luxurians, Zea nicaraguensis, and Zea mays subsp. huehuetenangensis) by Sanger or next-generation methods. An analysis of the microstructural changes, such as inversions, insertion or deletion mutations (indels) and determination of their frequencies were performed for the complete plastomes. It was determined that 193 indels and 15 inversions occurred across the examined plastomes of Zea. Tandem repeat indels were the most common type of microstructural change observed. Divergence times were estimated using a noncorrelated relaxed clock method. Divergence dates for specific nodes relative to Zea were calculated to fall between 38,000 years before present (YBP) for the subspecies included in this study and 23,000 YBP for section Luxuriantes included in this study. The stem lineage of all Zea species was calculated to have diverged at 176,000 YBP. The calculated mutation rates for the genus fell within the range of 1.7E-8 to 3.5E-8 microstructural changes per site per year. These rates of change are not uniform, despite the close relationships of taxa in this study. Phylogenomic analyses using full plastome alignments were also conducted to compare tree topologies from different types of mutations. In most cases, the previous work examining Zea mitochondrial and nuclear data was confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27488804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.