Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488632›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Voluntary Running Exercise-Mediated Enhanced Neurogenesis Does Not Obliterate Retrograde Spatial Memory.

Maheedhar Kodali, Tarick Megahed, Vikas Mishra, Bing Shuai, Bharathi Hattiangady, Ashok K Shetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maheedhar KodaliInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine at Scott and White, Temple, Texas 76502, Research Service, Olin E. Teague Veterans' Medical Center, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, Texas 76502, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, College Station, Texas 77843.
Tarick MegahedInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine at Scott and White, Temple, Texas 76502.
Vikas MishraInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine at Scott and White, Temple, Texas 76502, Research Service, Olin E. Teague Veterans' Medical Center, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, Texas 76502, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, College Station, Texas 77843.
Bing ShuaiInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine at Scott and White, Temple, Texas 76502, Research Service, Olin E. Teague Veterans' Medical Center, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, Texas 76502, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, College Station, Texas 77843.
Bharathi HattiangadyInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine at Scott and White, Temple, Texas 76502, Research Service, Olin E. Teague Veterans' Medical Center, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, Texas 76502, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, College Station, Texas 77843.
Ashok K ShettyInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine at Scott and White, Temple, Texas 76502, Research Service, Olin E. Teague Veterans' Medical Center, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, Texas 76502, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, College Station, Texas 77843 Shetty@medicine.tamhsc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-6671

Funding

BLRD VA I01 BX000883BLRD VA I01 BX002351BLRD VA IK6 BX003612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledRunning exercise (RE) improves cognition, formation of anterograde memories, and mood, alongside enhancing hippocampal neurogenesis. A previous investigation in a mouse model showed that RE-induced increased neurogenesis erases retrograde memory (Akers et al., 2014). However, it is unknown whether RE-induced forgetting is common to all species. We ascertained whether voluntary RE-induced enhanced neurogenesis interferes with the recall of spatial memory in rats. Young rats assigned to either sedentary (SED) or running exercise (RE) groups were first subjected to eight learning sessions in a water maze. A probe test (PT) conducted 24 h after the final training session confirmed that animals in either group had a similar ability for the recall of short-term memory. Following this, rats in the RE group were housed in larger cages fitted with running wheels, whereas rats in the SED group remained in standard cages. Animals in the RE group ran an average of 78 km in 4 weeks. A second PT performed 4 weeks after the first PT revealed comparable ability for memory recall between animals in the RE and SED groups, which was evidenced through multiple measures of memory retrieval function. The RE group displayed a 1.5- to 2.1-fold higher hippocampal neurogenesis than SED rats. Additionally, both moderate and brisk RE did not interfere with the recall of memory, although increasing amounts of RE proportionally enhanced neurogenesis. In conclusion, RE does not impair memory recall ability in a rat model despite substantially increasing neurogenesis. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Running exercise (RE) improves new memory formation along with an increased neurogenesis in the hippocampus. In view of a recent study showing that RE-mediated increased hippocampal neurogenesis promotes forgetfulness in a mouse model, we ascertained whether a similar adverse phenomenon exists in a rat model. Memory recall ability examined 4 weeks after learning confirmed that animals that had run a mean of 78 km and displayed a 1.5- to 2.1-fold increase in hippocampal neurogenesis demonstrated similar proficiency for memory recall as animals that had remained sedentary. Furthermore, both moderate and brisk RE did not interfere with memory recall, although increasing amounts of RE proportionally enhanced neurogenesis, implying that RE has no adverse effects on memory recall.

Indexed as

AnimalsExtinction, PsychologicalHippocampusMaleMemory, Short-TermNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityPhysical Conditioning, AnimalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRunningSpatial MemoryTask Performance and AnalysisVolitionforgettinghippocampal neurogenesismemory recallmemory retrievalrunning exercisewater maze test

Identifiers

PMID27488632
PMCPMC6601951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.