Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488631›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Knowledge Acquisition during Exam Preparation Improves Memory and Modulates Memory Formation.

Garvin Brod, Ulman Lindenberger, Anthony D Wagner, Yee Lee Shing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial intelligence predictsVeterinary pathology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Assimilation of Novel Information into Schemata and Its Efficient Consolidation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rewiring the connectome: Evidence and effects.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Garvin BrodThe Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7976-5609
Ulman LindenbergerThe Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, 14195 Berlin, Germany, European University Institute, 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8428-6453
Anthony D WagnerDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, and.ORCID 0000-0003-0624-4543
Yee Lee ShingThe Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, 14195 Berlin, Germany, Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, United Kingdom yee.shing@stir.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-7292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAccording to the schema-relatedness hypothesis, new experiences that make contact with existing schematic knowledge are more easily encoded and remembered than new experiences that do not. Here we investigate how real-life gains in schematic knowledge affect the neural correlates of episodic encoding, assessing medical students 3 months before and immediately after their final exams. Human participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while encoding associative information that varied in relatedness to medical knowledge (face-diagnosis vs face-name pairs). As predicted, improvements in memory performance over time were greater for face-diagnosis pairs (high knowledge-relevance) than for face-name pairs (low knowledge-relevance). Improved memory for face-diagnosis pairs was associated with smaller subsequent memory effects in the anterior hippocampus, along with increased functional connectivity between the anterior hippocampus and left middle temporal gyrus, a region important for the retrieval of stored conceptual knowledge. The decrease in the anterior hippocampus subsequent memory effect correlated with knowledge accumulation, as independently assessed by a web-based learning platform with which participants studied for their final exam. These findings suggest that knowledge accumulation sculpts the neural networks associated with successful memory formation, and highlight close links between knowledge acquired during studying and basic neurocognitive processes that establish durable memories. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In a sample of medical students, we tracked knowledge accumulation via a web-based learning platform and investigated its effects on memory formation before and after participants' final medical exam. Knowledge accumulation led to significant gains in memory for knowledge-related events and predicted a selective decrease in hippocampal activation for successful memory formation. Furthermore, enhanced functional connectivity was found between hippocampus and semantic processing regions. These findings (1) demonstrate that knowledge facilitates binding in the hippocampus by enhancing its communication with the association cortices, (2) highlight close links between knowledge induced in the real world and basic neurocognitive processes that establish durable memories, and (3) exemplify the utility of combining laboratory-based cognitive neuroscience research with real-world educational technology for the study of memory.

Indexed as

KnowledgeMemory, EpisodicTask Performance and AnalysisAdultBrainEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleMemory ConsolidationMemory, Short-TermNeuronal PlasticityRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adulteducational technologyfMRIhippocampusmiddle temporal gyrusprior knowledgeschema

Identifiers

PMID27488631
PMCPMC6601958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.