Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488630›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

A Neural Model of MST and MT Explains Perceived Object Motion during Self-Motion.

Oliver W Layton, Brett R Fajen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Retinal optic flow during natural locomotion.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Flow parsing and biological motion.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Hierarchical structure is employed by humans during visual motion perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computational Mechanisms for Perceptual Stability using Disparity and Motion Parallax.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Going with the Flow: The Neural Mechanisms Underlying Illusions of Complex-Flow Motion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. The Primary Role of Flow Processing in the Identification of Scene-Relative Object Movement.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oliver W LaytonDepartment of Cognitive Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180 laytoo2@rpi.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0501-2927
Brett R FajenDepartment of Cognitive Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWhen a moving object cuts in front of a moving observer at a 90° angle, the observer correctly perceives that the object is traveling along a perpendicular path just as if viewing the moving object from a stationary vantage point. Although the observer's own (self-)motion affects the object's pattern of motion on the retina, the visual system is able to factor out the influence of self-motion and recover the world-relative motion of the object (Matsumiya and Ando, 2009). This is achieved by using information in global optic flow (Rushton and Warren, 2005; Warren and Rushton, 2009; Fajen and Matthis, 2013) and other sensory arrays (Dupin and Wexler, 2013; Fajen et al., 2013; Dokka et al., 2015) to estimate and deduct the component of the object's local retinal motion that is due to self-motion. However, this account (known as "flow parsing") is qualitative and does not shed light on mechanisms in the visual system that recover object motion during self-motion. We present a simple computational account that makes explicit possible mechanisms in visual cortex by which self-motion signals in the medial superior temporal area interact with object motion signals in the middle temporal area to transform object motion into a world-relative reference frame. The model (1) relies on two mechanisms (MST-MT feedback and disinhibition of opponent motion signals in MT) to explain existing data, (2) clarifies how pathways for self-motion and object-motion perception interact, and (3) unifies the existing flow parsing hypothesis with established neurophysiological mechanisms. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: To intercept targets, we must perceive the motion of objects that move independently from us as we move through the environment. Although our self-motion substantially alters the motion of objects on the retina, compelling evidence indicates that the visual system at least partially compensates for self-motion such that object motion relative to the stationary environment can be more accurately perceived. We have developed a model that sheds light on plausible mechanisms within the visual system that transform retinal motion into a world-relative reference frame. Our model reveals how local motion signals (generated through interactions within the middle temporal area) and global motion signals (feedback from the dorsal medial superior temporal area) contribute and offers a new hypothesis about the connection between pathways for heading and object motion perception.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationFeedback, SensoryHumansMotion PerceptionOptic FlowOrientationRetinaVisual CortexfeedbackheadingMSTdMTobject motionself-motion

Identifiers

PMID27488630
PMCPMC6601960
OpenAlexW2497097262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.