Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488629›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Direction Selectivity in Drosophila Emerges from Preferred-Direction Enhancement and Null-Direction Suppression.

Jonathan Chit Sing Leong, Jennifer Judson Esch, Ben Poole, Surya Ganguli, Thomas Robert Clandinin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distribution and voltage dependence of ion channels shape single-neuron computations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Afterimages drive a shared visual motion-reversal illusion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation.Annual review of vision science · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Voltage to Calcium Transformation Enhances Direction Selectivity inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan Chit Sing LeongDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-9562-3360
Jennifer Judson EschDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine.
Ben PooleDepartment of Computer Science, and.
Surya GanguliDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Thomas Robert ClandininDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, trc@stanford.edu.
Institute of Neurobiology · BGStanford University · US

Funding

Dissecting Neural Circuit Computations in the Peripheral Visual SystemR01EY022638 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2012 to 2021
$3.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAcross animal phyla, motion vision relies on neurons that respond preferentially to stimuli moving in one, preferred direction over the opposite, null direction. In the elementary motion detector of Drosophila, direction selectivity emerges in two neuron types, T4 and T5, but the computational algorithm underlying this selectivity remains unknown. We find that the receptive fields of both T4 and T5 exhibit spatiotemporally offset light-preferring and dark-preferring subfields, each obliquely oriented in spacetime. In a linear-nonlinear modeling framework, the spatiotemporal organization of the T5 receptive field predicts the activity of T5 in response to motion stimuli. These findings demonstrate that direction selectivity emerges from the enhancement of responses to motion in the preferred direction, as well as the suppression of responses to motion in the null direction. Thus, remarkably, T5 incorporates the essential algorithmic strategies used by the Hassenstein-Reichardt correlator and the Barlow-Levick detector. Our model for T5 also provides an algorithmic explanation for the selectivity of T5 for moving dark edges: our model captures all two- and three-point spacetime correlations relevant to motion in this stimulus class. More broadly, our findings reveal the contribution of input pathway visual processing, specifically center-surround, temporally biphasic receptive fields, to the generation of direction selectivity in T5. As the spatiotemporal receptive field of T5 in Drosophila is common to the simple cell in vertebrate visual cortex, our stimulus-response model of T5 will inform efforts in an experimentally tractable context to identify more detailed, mechanistic models of a prevalent computation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Feature selective neurons respond preferentially to astonishingly specific stimuli, providing the neurobiological basis for perception. Direction selectivity serves as a paradigmatic model of feature selectivity that has been examined in many species. While insect elementary motion detectors have served as premiere experimental models of direction selectivity for 60 years, the central question of their underlying algorithm remains unanswered. Using in vivo two-photon imaging of intracellular calcium signals, we measure the receptive fields of the first direction-selective cells in the Drosophila visual system, and define the algorithm used to compute the direction of motion. Computational modeling of these receptive fields predicts responses to motion and reveals how this circuit efficiently captures many useful correlations intrinsic to moving dark edges.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationDrosophilaMotion PerceptionOrientation, SpatialPhotic StimulationSensory Receptor CellsSpace PerceptionSpatial NavigationVisual Cortexelementary motion detectionHassenstein–Reichardt correlatortwo-photon calcium imaging in vivo

Identifiers

PMID27488629
PMCPMC4971360
OpenAlexW2486948773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.