ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Direction Selectivity in Drosophila Emerges from Preferred-Direction Enhancement and Null-Direction Suppression.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distribution and voltage dependence of ion channels shape single-neuron computations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine learning discovers numerous new computational principles supporting elementary motion detection.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Afterimages drive a shared visual motion-reversal illusion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Adaptation to visual sparsity enhances responses to isolated stimuli.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation.Annual review of vision science · 2024Review
- Multilevel visual motion opponency in Drosophila.Nature neuroscience · 2023Article
- Direct comparison reveals algorithmic similarities in fly and mouse visual motion detection.iScience · 2023Article
- Long-timescale anti-directional rotation ineLife · 2023Article
- Article
- Long timescale anti-directional rotation in Drosophila optomotor behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Voltage to Calcium Transformation Enhances Direction Selectivity inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Bioinspired figure-ground discrimination via visual motion smoothing.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Visual and motor signatures of locomotion dynamically shape a population code for feature detection ineLife · 2022Article
- Excitatory and inhibitory neural dynamics jointly tune motion detection.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Populations of local direction-selective cells encode global motion patterns generated by self-motion.Science advances · 2022Article
- Flexible filtering by neural inputs supports motion computation across states and stimuli.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Predicting individual neuron responses with anatomically constrained task optimization.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledAcross animal phyla, motion vision relies on neurons that respond preferentially to stimuli moving in one, preferred direction over the opposite, null direction. In the elementary motion detector of Drosophila, direction selectivity emerges in two neuron types, T4 and T5, but the computational algorithm underlying this selectivity remains unknown. We find that the receptive fields of both T4 and T5 exhibit spatiotemporally offset light-preferring and dark-preferring subfields, each obliquely oriented in spacetime. In a linear-nonlinear modeling framework, the spatiotemporal organization of the T5 receptive field predicts the activity of T5 in response to motion stimuli. These findings demonstrate that direction selectivity emerges from the enhancement of responses to motion in the preferred direction, as well as the suppression of responses to motion in the null direction. Thus, remarkably, T5 incorporates the essential algorithmic strategies used by the Hassenstein-Reichardt correlator and the Barlow-Levick detector. Our model for T5 also provides an algorithmic explanation for the selectivity of T5 for moving dark edges: our model captures all two- and three-point spacetime correlations relevant to motion in this stimulus class. More broadly, our findings reveal the contribution of input pathway visual processing, specifically center-surround, temporally biphasic receptive fields, to the generation of direction selectivity in T5. As the spatiotemporal receptive field of T5 in Drosophila is common to the simple cell in vertebrate visual cortex, our stimulus-response model of T5 will inform efforts in an experimentally tractable context to identify more detailed, mechanistic models of a prevalent computation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Feature selective neurons respond preferentially to astonishingly specific stimuli, providing the neurobiological basis for perception. Direction selectivity serves as a paradigmatic model of feature selectivity that has been examined in many species. While insect elementary motion detectors have served as premiere experimental models of direction selectivity for 60 years, the central question of their underlying algorithm remains unanswered. Using in vivo two-photon imaging of intracellular calcium signals, we measure the receptive fields of the first direction-selective cells in the Drosophila visual system, and define the algorithm used to compute the direction of motion. Computational modeling of these receptive fields predicts responses to motion and reveals how this circuit efficiently captures many useful correlations intrinsic to moving dark edges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.