Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488518›Full record

ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2016

The impact of HLA-matching on reduced intensity conditioning regimen unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients above 50 years-a report from the EBMT acute leukemia working party.

Marie T Rubio, Bipin N Savani, Myriam Labopin, Emmanuelle Polge, Dietger Niederwieser, Arnold Ganser, Rainer Schwerdtfeger, Gerhard Ehninger, Jürgen Finke, Arnold Renate and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Marie T RubioDepartment of Hematology, Hôpital Brabois, CHRU Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. mt_rubio@hotmail.com.
Bipin N SavaniAcute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT, Paris, France. Bipin.Savani@Vanderbilt.Edu.
Myriam LabopinAcute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle PolgeAcute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT, Paris, France.
Dietger NiederwieserDivision Hematology, Oncology and Hemostasiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Arnold GanserDepartment of Haematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Rainer SchwerdtfegerDeutsche KlinikfürDiagnostik, KMT Zentrum, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Gerhard EhningerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen FinkeDepartment of Medicine, Hematology, Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Arnold RenateMedizinischeKlinik m. S. Hämatologie/Onkologie, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charles CraddockCentre for Clinical Haematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Nicolaus KrögerDepartment of Stem cell Transplantation, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael HallekDepartment of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Pavel JindraDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Charles University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Mohamad MohtyAcute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT, Paris, France.
Arnon NaglerAcute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRAcute Leukemia French Association · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECharles University · CZDeutsche Klinik für Diagnostik · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBSheba Medical Center · ILUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData comparing fully matched and mismatched-unrelated-donor (M- and mM-URD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) following reduced intensity conditioning regimens for acute myeloid leukemia are limited.

methodsWe retrospectively compared the outcome of 3398 patients above the age of 50 years who underwent 10/10 M-URD (n = 2567), 9/10 (n = 723), or 8/10 (n = 108) mM-URD allo-SCT for acute myeloid leukemia after reduced intensity conditioning regimen between 2000 and 2013. The Kaplan-Meier estimator, the cumulative incidence function, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used where appropriate.

resultsHLA matching had no impact on engraftment (p = 0.31). In univariate analysis, in comparison to 10/10 M-URD, mM-URD was associated with higher incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (p = 0.0002), similar rates of chronic GVHD (p = 0.138) but increased incidence of its extensive form (p = 0.047). Compared to 10/10 M-URD, patients transplanted in the first complete remission (CR1) with a 9 or an 8/10 mM-URD had decreased 2-year leukemia free (LFS) (p = 0.005) and overall survivals (OS) (56.7, 46.1, and 50.2 %, respectively, p = 0.005), while outcomes were comparable between all groups for patients transplanted beyond CR1. In multivariate analysis, 9/10 versus 10/10 URD was associated with higher non-relapse mortality (HR 1.34, p = 0.001), similar risk of relapse and chronic GVHD and inferior LFS (HR 1.25, p = 0.0001), and OS (HR 1.27, p = 0.0001). There was no difference in adjusted transplant outcomes between 9/10 and 8/10 mM-URD.

conclusionsReduced intensity conditioned allo-SCT with a 10/10 M-URD remains the preferable option for AML patients above the age of 50 years. The use of a 9/10 or an 8/10 mM-URD in patients not having a fully matched donor represents an alternative therapeutic option that should be compared to other alternative donor transplant strategies.

Indexed as

Histocompatibility TestingUnrelated DonorsAgedFemaleGraft SurvivalGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTransplantation ConditioningAcute leukemiaAllogeneic stem cell transplantationAnti-leukemic effectHLA matchingOlder patientsToxicityUnrelated donor

Identifiers

PMID27488518
PMCPMC4971653
OpenAlexW2480574868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.