Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488470›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2016

Successful implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program shortens length of stay and improves postoperative pain, and bowel and bladder function after colorectal surgery.

Ankit Sarin, Erik S Litonius, Ramana Naidu, C Spencer Yost, Madhulika G Varma, Lee-Lynn Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparison of interventions and outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2456 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Economic analyses of fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ankit SarinDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Erik S LitoniusDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave. M917, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0624, USA.
Ramana NaiduDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave. M917, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0624, USA.
C Spencer YostDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave. M917, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0624, USA.
Madhulika G VarmaDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Lee-Lynn ChenDepartment of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave. M917, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0624, USA. Lee-lynn.Chen@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6177-063X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite international data indicating that Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, which combine evidence-based perioperative strategies, expedite recovery after surgery, few centers have successfully adopted this approach within the U.S. We describe the implementation and efficacy of an ERAS program for colorectal abdominal surgery in a tertiary teaching center in the U.S.

methodsWe used a multi-modal and continuously evolving approach to implement an ERAS program among all patients undergoing colorectal abdominal surgery at a single hospital at the University of California, San Francisco. 279 patients who participated in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery program were compared to 245 previous patients who underwent surgery prior to implementation of the program. Primary end points were length of stay and readmission rates. Secondary end points included postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of urinary catheterization, and time to first solid meal.

resultsERAS decreased both median total hospital length of stay (6.4 to 4.4 days) and post-procedure length of stay (6.0 to 4.1 days). 30-day all-cause readmission rates decreased from 21 to 9.4 %. Pain scores improved on postoperative day 0 (3.2 to 2.1) and day 1 (3.2 to 2.6) despite decreased opioid. Median time to first solid meal decreased from 4.7 to 2.7 days and duration of urinary catheterization decreased from 74 to 46 h. Similar improvements were observed in all other secondary end points.

conclusionsThese results confirm that a multidisciplinary, iterative, team-based approach is associated with a reduction in hospital stay and an acceleration in recovery without increasing readmission rates.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColonDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainProspective StudiesDecreased length of stayEnhanced recovery after colorectal surgeryOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID27488470
PMCPMC4973042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.