Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488411›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Cool Runnings - an app-based intervention for reducing hot drink scalds: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

J D Burgess, C M Cameron, K Watt, R M Kimble

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Measuring User Engagement with a Socially Connected, Gamified Health Promotion Mobile App.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Burn first aid issues again-"Not seeing the forest for the trees".Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J D BurgessCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, University of Queensland, Level 7, 62 Graham Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia. jacquii@uq.edu.au.
C M CameronMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Queensland, 4031, Australia.
K WattCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
R M KimbleCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, University of Queensland, Level 7, 62 Graham Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUGriffith University · AUJames Cook University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, burns are the fifth leading cause of non-fatal children's injuries, and the leading cause of childhood burns is hot beverage scalds. Although there have been a number of programmes aimed at preventing scalds in children, very few have specifically addressed hot beverage scalds, and fewer have reported a reduction in injury rates. In Australia, hot beverage scalds account for 18 % of all childhood burns - a figure that has remained constant for the past decade. Innovative new technologies, such as Smartphone applications (apps), present a novel way for delivering individual-level injury prevention messages. The low cost, scalability and broad reach make this technology an ideal channel for health interventions. One of the latest methods being used in health-related apps aimed at behaviour change is gamification. Gamification uses the gaming principles of rewards, competition and personalisation to engage participants and motivate them towards preferred behaviours. This intervention will use a Smartphone app-based platform that combines gamification and behaviour-change strategies to increase knowledge and awareness of hot beverage scald risks and burn first aid among mothers of young children. METHODS/

designThis is a two-group, parallel, single-blinded randomised control trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of a Smartphone app-based injury prevention intervention. The primary outcome measure is change in knowledge. Change in knowledge is measured in three components: knowledge of correct burns first aid; knowledge of the main cause of burns/scalds in children aged 0-15yrs; knowledge of the main age group at risk for burns/scalds. The secondary outcome measures relate to the gamification methods, measuring participants frequency of engagement with the Cool Runnings app. Queensland-based mothers aged 18+ years who own a Smartphone and have at least one child aged 5-12 months are eligible to participate. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate an app-based delivery of injury prevention messages, and the first study to test the efficacy of gamification techniques in an injury prevention intervention. If this intervention is found to be effective, this RCT will provide a platform for targeting other childhood injury prevention campaigns.

trial registrationThis trial was registered on 14 January 2016 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12616000019404 ).

Indexed as

Game TheoryHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBeveragesBurnsChildChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsFemaleFirst AidHot TemperatureHumansBurnsInjury preventionInterventionPaediatricScaldsSmartphone applications

Identifiers

PMID27488411
PMCPMC4973069
OpenAlexW2490313951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.