ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2016
Health Concept and Knowledge Management: Twenty-five Years of Evolution.
Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended Grammar of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms for Semantic Representation of Clinical Data: Methodological Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Semantics in action: a guide for representing clinical data elements with SNOMED CT.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- Implementation of inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical studies in OHDSI ATLAS software.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Comparison of the accuracy of Japanese synonym identifications using word embeddings in the radiological technology field.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Ontologizing health systems data at scale: making translational discovery a reality.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Why Is the Electronic Health Record So Challenging for Research and Clinical Care?Methods of information in medicine · 2021Article
- Classification, Ontology, and Precision Medicine.The New England journal of medicine · 2018Review
- Recent Developments in Clinical Terminologies - SNOMED CT, LOINC, and RxNorm.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2018Article
- Terminology Services: Standard Terminologies to Control Health Vocabulary.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2018Article
- The rendering of human phenotype and rare diseases in ICD-11.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe fields of health terminology, classification, ontology, and related information models have evolved dramatically over the past 25 years. Our objective was to review notable trends, described emerging or enabling technologies, and highlight major terminology systems during the interval.
methodsWe review the progression in health terminology systems informed by our own experiences as part of the community involved in this work, reinforced with literature review and citation.
resultsThe transformation in size, scope, complexity, and adoption of health terminological systems and information models has been tremendous, on the scale of orders of magnitude.
conclusionThe present "big science" era of inference and discovery in biomedicine would not have been possible or scalable absent the growth and maturation of health terminology systems and information models over the past 25 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.