Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488370›Full record

SynthesisDysphagia2016

Treatment Effects for Dysphagia in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.

Dalal Alali, Kirrie Ballard, Hans Bogaardt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05063708 (To Evaluate the Activity and the Efficacy of Traditional Swallowing Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05063708 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

To Evaluate the Activity and the Efficacy of Traditional Swallowing Therapy (TST) Plus Neuromuscular Electrostimulation (NMES) vs TST Plus Sham- NMES in Multiple Sclerosis People With Dysphagia

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled136ConditionsDeglutition Disorders, Multiple SclerosisArmsExperimental: traditional dysphagia therapy plus Neuromuscular electrostimulation, Sham Comparator: Traditional dysphagia therapy plus sham Neuromuscular electrostimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Murine Esophagus Expresses Glial-Derived Central Nervous System Antigens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Anodal tDCS of the swallowing motor cortex for treatment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: a pilot open-label study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dalal AlaliUniversity of Sydney, FHS/S164, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia. dala4451@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Kirrie BallardUniversity of Sydney, FHS, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.
Hans BogaardtUniversity of Sydney, FHS/S169, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW, 2141, Australia.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysphagia or swallowing difficulties have been reported to be a concern in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS). This problem can result in several complications including aspiration pneumonia, reduced quality of life and an increase in mortality rate. No previous systematic reviews on treatment effects for dysphagia in MS have been published. The main objective of this study is to summarise and qualitatively analyse published studies on treatment effects for dysphagia in MS. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were applied to conduct a systematic search of seven databases, using relevant key words, and subsequent analysis of the identified studies. The studies were required to meet all three inclusion criteria of including a statement on intention to treat, or measure the effects of treatment for dysphagia in adults with MS and data on treatment outcomes for at least one adult diagnosed with MS. Retained studies were evaluated by two independent reviewers using a critical appraisal tool. This study has not been registered. A total of 563 studies were identified from the database searches. After screening and assessment of full articles for eligibility, five studies were included in the review. Three examined electrical stimulation and two examined the use of botulinum toxin. One study testing electrical stimulation was a randomised controlled trial, two were well-designed case series and two were case series lacking experimental control. All studies reported some positive effects on dysphagia; however, treatments that involved the use of electrical stimulation showed larger effect sizes. There is a paucity of evidence to guide treatment of dysphagia in MS, with only electrical stimulation and botulinum toxin treatment represented in the literature search conducted here. While both treatments show initial promise for reducing the swallowing impairment, they require further research using well-controlled experimental designs to determine their clinical applicability and long-term treatment effects for dysphagia across different types and severity of MS.

Indexed as

AdultBotulinum ToxinsDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersElectric Stimulation TherapyHumansMultiple SclerosisNeurotoxinsTreatment OutcomeBotulinum ToxinsNeurotoxinsDeglutitionDysphagiaMultiple sclerosisSystematic reviewTreatment

Identifiers

PMID27488370
OpenAlexW2483882780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.