Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488366›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Allogeneic anorectal transplantation in rats: technical considerations and preliminary results.

Flavio H F Galvão, Daniel R Waisberg, Victor E Seid, Anderson C L Costa, Eleazar Chaib, Rachel Rossini Baptista, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Cinthia Lanchotte, Ruy J Cruz, Jun Araki and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Flavio H F GalvãoLaboratory of Experimental Transplant Surgery, LIM-37, Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel R WaisbergLaboratory of Experimental Transplant Surgery, LIM-37, Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Victor E SeidLaboratory of Experimental Transplant Surgery, LIM-37, Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Anderson C L CostaDepartment of Pathology FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eleazar ChaibLaboratory of Experimental Transplant Surgery, LIM-37, Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Rachel Rossini BaptistaLaboratory of Experimental Transplant Surgery, LIM-37, Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Vera Luiza CapelozziDepartment of Pathology FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cinthia LanchotteLaboratory of Experimental Transplant Surgery, LIM-37, Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Ruy J CruzIntestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jun ArakiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Luiz Carneiro D'AlbuquerqueLaboratory of Experimental Transplant Surgery, LIM-37, Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRCentro Universitário das Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas · BRThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal incontinence is a challenging condition with numerous available treatment modalities. Success rates vary across these modalities, and permanent colostomy is often indicated when they fail. For these cases, a novel potential therapeutic strategy is anorectal transplantation (ATx). We performed four isogeneic (Lewis-to-Lewis) and seven allogeneic (Wistar-to-Lewis) ATx procedures. The anorectum was retrieved with a vascular pedicle containing the aorta in continuity with the inferior mesenteric artery and portal vein in continuity with the inferior mesenteric vein. In the recipient, the native anorectal segment was removed and the graft was transplanted by end-to-side aorta-aorta and porto-cava anastomoses and end-to-end colorectal anastomosis. Recipients were sacrificed at the experimental endpoint on postoperative day 30. Surviving animals resumed normal body weight gain and clinical performance within 5 days of surgery. Isografts and 42.9% of allografts achieved normal clinical evolution up to the experimental endpoint. In 57.1% of allografts, signs of immunological rejection (abdominal distention, diarrhea, and anal mucosa inflammation) were observed three weeks after transplantation. Histology revealed moderate to severe rejection in allografts and no signs of rejection in isografts. We describe a feasible model of ATx in rats, which may allow further physiological and immunologic studies.

Indexed as

Anal CanalAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsAortaColostomyMaleMesenteric Artery, InferiorPlastic Surgery ProceduresPortal VeinQuality of LifeRatsRats, Inbred LewRats, WistarTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID27488366
PMCPMC4973224
OpenAlexW2489035116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.