Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488266›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2016

Indicated school-based intervention to improve depressive symptoms among at risk Chilean adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.

Jorge Gaete, Vania Martinez, Rosemarie Fritsch, Graciela Rojas, Alan A Montgomery, Ricardo Araya

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Psychological Treatments for Depression in Adolescents: More Than Three Decades Later.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  8. The Impact of Referral to Mental Health Services on Suicide Death Risk in Adolescent Suicide Survivors.Soa--ch'ongsonyon chongsin uihak = Journal of child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge GaeteCentre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. jorge.gaete@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-6018
Vania MartinezMillennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile.
Rosemarie FritschUniversidad de Chile, Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Clínica Psiquiátrica Universitaria, Av. La Paz 1003, Recoleta, Santiago, Chile.
Graciela RojasMillennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile.
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ricardo ArayaCentre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 082584 Z/07/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is a disabling condition affecting people of all ages, but generally starting during adolescence. Schools seem to be an excellent setting where preventive interventions may be delivered. This study aimed to test the effectiveness of an indicated school-based intervention to reduce depressive symptoms among at-risk adolescents from low-income families.

methodsA two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 11 secondary schools in vulnerable socioeconomic areas in Santiago, Chile. High-risk students in year 10 (2° Medio) were invited to a baseline assessment (n = 1048). Those who scored ≥10 (boys) and ≥15 (girls) in the BDI-II were invited to the trial (n = 376). A total of 342 students consented and were randomly allocated into an intervention or a control arm in a ratio of 2:1. The intervention consisted of 8 group sessions of 45 min each, based on cognitive-behavioural models and delivered by two trained psychologists in the schools. Primary (BDI-II) and secondary outcomes (measures of anxiety, automatic thoughts and problem-solving skills) were administered before and at 3 months post intervention. The primary outcome was the recovery rate, defined as the proportion of participants who scored in the BDI-II <10 (among boys) and <15 (among girls) at 3 months after completing the intervention.

resultsThere were 229 participants in the intervention group and 113 in the control group. At 3-month follow-up 81.4 % in the intervention and 81.7 % in the control group provided outcome data. The recovery rate was 10 % higher in the intervention (50.3 %) than in the control (40.2 %) group; with an adjusted OR = 1.62 (95 % CI: 0.95 to 2.77) (p = 0.08). No difference between groups was found in any of the secondary outcomes. Secondary analyses revealed an interaction between group and baseline BDI-II score.

conclusionsWe found no clear evidence of the effectiveness of a brief, indicated school-based intervention based on cognitive-behavioural models on reducing depressive symptoms among Chilean adolescents from low-income families. More research is needed in order to find better solutions to prevent depression among adolescents.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN33871591 . Retrospectively registered 29 June 2011.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAnxietyChileCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleStudentsSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentsDepressionIndicated-school based interventionPrevention

Identifiers

PMID27488266
PMCPMC4973098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.