Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488262›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

The impact of multiple chronic diseases on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.

Inês Dantas, Rui Santana, João Sarmento, Pedro Aguiar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Impoverishing effects of out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures in India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Inês DantasNational School of Public Health (ENSP), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisbon, Portugal. isadantas@gmail.com.
Rui SantanaDepartment of Health Policy and Systems Management, National School of Public Health (ENSP), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisbon, Portugal.
João SarmentoNational School of Public Health (ENSP), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro AguiarPublic Health Research Centre (PHRC), National School of Public Health (ENSP), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Av. Padre Cruz, 1600-560, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high financial burden of avoidable hospitalizations has led to an increase of the study of hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC). There is limited information on the impact of secondary diagnoses on these hospitalizations, although patients' social and demographic characteristics, as well as the coexistence of multiple diseases are often identified in the literature as risk factors for avoidable hospitalizations. This study explores the impact of chronic conditions on the likelihood of hospitalizations for ACSC.

methodsData were extracted from the Portuguese hospital discharge database. Avoidable hospitalizations were identified according to the Canadian Institute for Healthcare Information, and chronic conditions were identified according to criteria set by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. A retrospective study analysing all patients hospitalized for an ACSC and all patients hospitalized for non-ACSC was made, using multiple logistic regression models to identify the impact of chronic conditions on the risk of admission.

resultsThe risk of an avoidable hospitalization increases by a factor of 1.35 (95 % CI [1.34;1.35]) for each additional chronic condition, and 1.55 (95 % CI [1.55;1.56]) for each additional body system affected. The respiratory and circulatory systems have the most impact on the risk of ACSC, increasing the risk by 8.72 (95 % CI [8.58;8.86]) and 3.01 (95 % CI [2.95;3.06]), respectively.

conclusionsThe number of chronic conditions and the body systems affected increase the risk of hospital admissions for ACSC.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareChronic DiseaseComorbidityHospitalizationPatient DischargeAdultAgedCanadaDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareEthnicityFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAmbulatory care sensitive conditionsAvoidable hospitalizationsChronic conditions

Identifiers

PMID27488262
PMCPMC4973077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.