Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488181›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

European COMPARative Effectiveness research on blended Depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries.

Annet Kleiboer, Jan Smit, Judith Bosmans, Jeroen Ruwaard, Gerhard Andersson, Naira Topooco, Thomas Berger, Tobias Krieger, Cristina Botella, Rosa Baños and 14 more

7 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02361684 nacompletednot on this map

European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-based Depression Treatment - Spanish Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Jaume IRan2015 to 2019Enrolled160ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsBlended CBT treatment, Treatment as usual
NCT02389660 nacompletednot on this map

European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-based Depression Treatment in Poland [Europejskie Badania Porównawcze Nad Efektywnością Interwencji Internetowej Dla Osób z Depresją] (E-COMPARED)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Social Sciences and Humanities, WarsawRan2015 to 2018Enrolled84ConditionsDepressionArmsBlended Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Treatment as usual
NCT02410616 nacompletednot on this map

European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-based Depression Treatment - Swiss Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BernRan2015 to 2017Enrolled50ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsBlended CBT, Treatment as usual
NCT02449447 nacompletednot on this map

European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-based Depression in Sweden (E-compared) Treatment). A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Blended Internet and Face-to-face CBT Against Treatment as Usual

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2015 to 2017Enrolled150ConditionsMajor Depressive DisordersArmsCognitive behavioral therapy, Treatment as usual
NCT02542891 nacompletednot on this map

E-Compared: Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet Based Depression Treatment- French Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan2015 to 2018Enrolled105ConditionsDepressive DisorderArmsBlended CBT, Treatment as Usual (TAU)
NCT03473535 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The BEACON Study: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Smartphone-assisted Problem Solving Therapy in Men Who Present With Intentional Self-harm to Emergency Departments in Ontario

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsIntentional Self-Harm, SuicideArmsBEACON + Problem Solving Therapy, Problem-Solving Therapy
NCT03489382 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The BEACON Study: Protocol for Cluster RCT of a Service to Deliver Smartphone-Assisted Problem-Solving Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Men Who Present With Intentional Self-Harm to the ED in Ontario (Protocol A)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsIntentional Self-Harm, SuicideArmsSmartphone Assisted PST
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Annet KleiboerSection Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.m.kleiboer@vu.nl.
Jan SmitDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith BosmansDepartment of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen RuwaardSection Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Naira TopoocoDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Thomas BergerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tobias KriegerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Cristina BotellaDepartment of Psychology and Technology, Jaume University, Castellon, Spain.
Rosa BañosDepartment of Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Valencia, Spain.
Karine ChevreulURC-ECO, Ile-de-France (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Ricardo ArayaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Arlinda Cerga-PashojaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Roman CieślakDepartment of Psychology, Szkoła Wyzsza Psychologii Społeczne, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna RogalaDepartment of Psychology, Szkoła Wyzsza Psychologii Społeczne, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland.
Christiaan VisSection Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stasja DraismaDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anneke van SchaikDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lise KemmerenDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David EbertDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Matthias BerkingDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Burkhardt FunkInstitut für elektronische Geschäftsprozesse, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Pim CuijpersSection Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen RiperSection Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and EMGO+ Institute for Health Care and Research, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective, accessible, and affordable depression treatment is of high importance considering the large personal and economic burden of depression. Internet-based treatment is considered a promising clinical and cost-effective alternative to current routine depression treatment strategies such as face-to-face psychotherapy. However, it is not clear whether research findings translate to routine clinical practice such as primary or specialized mental health care. The E-COMPARED project aims to gain knowledge on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of blended depression treatment compared to treatment-as-usual in routine care. METHODS/

designE-COMPARED will employ a pragmatic, multinational, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries. Adults diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) will be recruited in primary care (Germany, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) or specialized mental health care (France, The Netherlands, and Switzerland). Regular care for depression is compared to "blended" service delivery combining mobile and Internet technologies with face-to-face treatment in one treatment protocol. Participants will be followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline to determine clinical improvements in symptoms of depression (primary outcome: Patient Health Questionnaire-9), remission of depression, and cost-effectiveness. Main analyses will be conducted on the pooled data from the eight countries (n = 1200 in total, 150 participants in each country). DISCUSSION: The E-COMPARED project will provide mental health care stakeholders with evidence-based information and recommendations on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of blended depression treatment.

trial registrationFrance: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02542891 . Registered on 4 September 2015; Germany: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006866 . Registered on 2 December 2014; The Netherlands: Netherlands Trials Register NTR4962 . Registered on 5 January 2015; Poland: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT02389660 . Registered on 18 February 2015; Spain: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02361684 . Registered on 8 January 2015; Sweden: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02449447 . Registered on 30 March 2015; Switzerland: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02410616 . Registered on 2 April 2015; United Kingdom: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN12388725 . Registered on 20 March 2015.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyComparative Effectiveness ResearchMajor Depressive DisorderTherapy, Computer-AssistedClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicEuropeHealth Care CostsHumansInternetPrimary Health CareRemission InductionResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsAdultsBlended treatmentCognitive behavioral treatment (CBT)Comparative effectiveness research (CER)Cost-effectivenessDepressioneHealthiCBTInternet-based treatmentRandomized controlled trial (RCT)

Identifiers

PMID27488181
PMCPMC4972947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 1 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.