Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27488010›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2016

Isolation & characterization of Brucella melitensis isolated from patients suspected for human brucellosis in India.

Anita Barua, Ashu Kumar, Duraipandian Thavaselvam, Smita Mangalgi, Archana Prakash, Sapana Tiwari, Sonia Arora, Kannusamy Sathyaseelan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Genomic insights intoMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita BaruaMicrobiology Division, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, Bijapur, India.
Ashu KumarMicrobiology Division, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, Bijapur, India.
Duraipandian ThavaselvamMicrobiology Division, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, Bijapur, India.
Smita MangalgiMicrobiology Division, Shri BM Patil Medical College, BLDE University, Bijapur, India.
Archana PrakashMicrobiology Division, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, Bijapur, India.
Sapana TiwariMicrobiology Division, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, Bijapur, India.
Sonia AroraMicrobiology Division, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, Bijapur, India.
Kannusamy SathyaseelanMicrobiology Division, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, Bijapur, India.
Defence Research and Development Establishment · INShri BM Patil Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectivesBrucellosis is endemic in the southern part of India. A combination of biochemical, serological and molecular methods is required for identification and biotyping of Brucella. The present study describes the isolation and biochemical, molecular characterization of Brucella melitensis from patients suspected for human brucellosis.

methodsThe blood samples were collected from febrile patients suspected to have brucellosis. A total of 18 isolates were obtained from 102 blood samples subjected to culture. The characterization of these 18 isolates was done by growth on Brucella specific medium, biochemical reactions, CO2 requirement, H2S production, agglutination with A and M mono-specific antiserum, dye sensitivity to basic fuchsin and thionin. Further, molecular characterization of the isolates was done by amplification of B. melitensis species specific IS 711 repetitive DNA fragment and 16S (rRNA) sequence analysis. PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of omp2 locus and IS711 gene was also done for molecular characterization.

resultsAll 102 suspected samples were subjected to bacteria isolation and of these, 18 isolates could be recovered on blood culture. The biochemical, PCR and PCR-RFLP and 16s rRNA sequencing revealed that all isolates were of B. melitensis and matched exactly with reference strain B. melitensis 16M. INTERPRETATION &

conclusionsThe present study showed an overall isolation rate of 17.64 per cent for B. melitensis. There is a need to establish facilities for isolation and characterization of Brucella species for effective clinical management of the disease among patients as well as surveillance and control of infection in domestic animals. Further studies are needed from different geographical areas of the country with different level of endemicity to plan and execute control strategies against human brucellosis.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBrucella melitensisBrucellosisHumansIndiaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27488010
PMCPMC4989840
OpenAlexW2486240916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.