Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27487948›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2016

Comparative genomic analysis of retrogene repertoire in two green algae Volvox carteri and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Marcin Jąkalski, Kazutaka Takeshita, Mathieu Deblieck, Kanako O Koyanagi, Izabela Makałowska, Hidemi Watanabe, Wojciech Makałowski

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Retrotransposition facilitated the establishment of a primary plastid in the thecate amoebaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcin JąkalskiInstitute of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Kazutaka TakeshitaGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0814, Japan.
Mathieu DeblieckInstitute of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Kanako O KoyanagiGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0814, Japan.
Izabela MakałowskaDepartment of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614, Poznań, Poland.
Hidemi WatanabeGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0814, Japan.
Wojciech MakałowskiInstitute of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany. wojmak@uni-muenster.de.
Hokkaido University · JPAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetroposition, one of the processes of copying the genetic material, is an important RNA-mediated mechanism leading to the emergence of new genes. Because the transcription controlling segments are usually not copied to the new location in this mechanism, the duplicated gene copies (retrocopies) become pseudogenized. However, few can still survive, e.g. by recruiting novel regulatory elements from the region of insertion. Subsequently, these duplicated genes can contribute to the formation of lineage-specific traits and phenotypic diversity. Despite the numerous studies of the functional retrocopies (retrogenes) in animals and plants, very little is known about their presence in green algae, including morphologically diverse species. The current availability of the genomes of both uni- and multicellular algae provides a good opportunity to conduct a genome-wide investigation in order to fill the knowledge gap in retroposition phenomenon in this lineage.

resultsHere we present a comparative genomic analysis of uni- and multicellular algae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Volvox carteri, respectively, to explore their retrogene complements. By adopting a computational approach, we identified 141 retrogene candidates in total in both genomes, with their fraction being significantly higher in the multicellular Volvox. Majority of the retrogene candidates showed signatures of functional constraints, thus indicating their functionality. Detailed analyses of the identified retrogene candidates, their parental genes, and homologs of both, revealed that most of the retrogene candidates were derived from ancient retroposition events in the common ancestor of the two algae and that the parental genes were subsequently lost from the respective lineages, making many retrogenes 'orphan'.

conclusionWe revealed that the genomes of the green algae have maintained many possibly functional retrogenes in spite of experiencing various molecular evolutionary events during a long evolutionary time after the retroposition events. Our first report about the retrogene set in the green algae provides a good foundation for any future investigation of the repertoire of retrogenes and facilitates the assessment of the evolutionary impact of retroposition on diverse morphological traits in this lineage. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by William Martin and Piotr Zielenkiewicz.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantRetroelementsAlgal ProteinsChlamydomonas reinhardtiiPlant ProteinsVolvoxAlgal ProteinsPlant ProteinsRetroelementsChlamydomonasComparative genomicsGreen algaeMulticellularityRetrogenesRetropositionVolvox

Identifiers

PMID27487948
PMCPMC4972966
OpenAlexW2505797030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.