Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27487183›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Self-Reported Health Experiences of Children Living with Congenital Heart Defects: Including Patient-Reported Outcomes in a National Cohort Study.

Rachel Louise Knowles, Valerija Tadic, Ailbhe Hogan, Catherine Bull, Jugnoo Sangeeta Rahi, Carol Dezateux, UK Collaborative Study of Congenital Heart Defects (UKCSCHD)

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiovascular Trials.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel Louise KnowlesLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, Population Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5490-7682
Valerija TadicLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, Population Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ailbhe HoganLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, Population Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine BullCardiac Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jugnoo Sangeeta RahiLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, Population Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carol DezateuxLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, Population Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
UK Collaborative Study of Congenital Heart Defects (UKCSCHD)
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/02/065/13934Medical Research Council G106/1083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding children's views about living with congenital heart defects (CHDs) is fundamental to supporting their successful participation in daily life, school and peer relationships. As an adjunct to a health and quality of life outcomes questionnaire, we asked school-age children who survived infant heart procedures to describe their experiences of living with CHDs.

methodsIn a UK-wide cohort study, children aged 10 to 14 years with CHDs self-completed postal questionnaires that included an open question about having a 'heart problem'. We compared the characteristics of children with more and less severe cardiac diagnoses and, through collaborative inductive content analysis, investigated the subjective experiences and coping strategies described by children in both clinical severity groups.

resultsText and/or drawings were returned by 436 children (246 boys [56%], mean age 12.1 years [SD 1.0; range 10-14]); 313 had less severe (LS) and 123 more severe (MS) cardiac diagnoses. At the most recent hospital visit, a higher proportion of the MS group were underweight (more than two standard deviations below the mean for age) or cyanosed (underweight: MS 20.0%, LS 9.9%; cyanosed: MS 26.2%, LS 3.5%). Children in the MS group described concerns about social isolation and feeling 'different', whereas children with less severe diagnoses often characterised their CHD as 'not a big thing'. Some coping strategies were common to both severity groups, including managing health information to avoid social exclusion, however only children in the LS group considered their CHD 'in the past' or experienced a sense of survivorship.

conclusionsChildren's reported experiences were not dependent on their cardiac diagnosis, although there were clear qualitative differences by clinical severity group. Children's concerns emphasised social participation and our findings imply a need to shift the clinical focus from monitoring cardiac function to optimising participation. We highlight the potential for informing and evaluating clinical practice and service provision through seeking patient-reported outcomes in paediatric care.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentChildCohort StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMalePatient ParticipationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID27487183
PMCPMC4972252
OpenAlexW2505636831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.