Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486988›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Epigenetic reprogramming and aberrant expression of PRAME are associated with increased metastatic risk in Class 1 and Class 2 uveal melanomas.

Matthew G Field, Michael A Durante, Christina L Decatur, Bercin Tarlan, Kristen M Oelschlager, John F Stone, Jeffim Kuznetsov, Anne M Bowcock, Stefan Kurtenbach, J William Harbour

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Gene therapy for uveal melanoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew G FieldBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Michael A DuranteBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Christina L DecaturBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Bercin TarlanBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Kristen M OelschlagerCastle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA.
John F StoneCastle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA.
Jeffim KuznetsovBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Anne M BowcockNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Stefan KurtenbachBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
J William HarbourBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Miami · USImperial College London · GB

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Marco Ruggeri · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
THE GENETICS OF OCULAR MELANOMAR01CA161870 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BOWCOCK, ANNE MARY · 2011 to 2024
$5.5M
MOLECULAR PREDICTIVE TESTING IN OCULAR MELANOMAR01CA125970 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CORREA, ZELIA MARIA, HARBOUR, JAMES WILLIAM · 2006 to 2021
$4.9M
The role of PRAME in promoting metastasis in uveal melanomaF30CA206430 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FIELD, MATTHEW GARRETT · 2016 to 2018
$147k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA206430NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125970NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161870NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe previously identified PRAME as a biomarker for metastatic risk in Class 1 uveal melanomas. In this study, we sought to define a threshold value for positive PRAME expression (PRAME+) in a large dataset, identify factors associated with PRAME expression, evaluate the prognostic value of PRAME in Class 2 uveal melanomas, and determine whether PRAME expression is associated with aberrant hypomethylation of the PRAME promoter.

resultsAmong 678 samples analyzed by qPCR, 498 (73.5%) were PRAME- and 180 (26.5%) were PRAME+. Class 1 tumors were more likely to be PRAME-, whereas Class 2 tumors were more likely to be PRAME+ (P < 0.0001). PRAME expression was associated with shorter time to metastasis and melanoma specific mortality in Class 2 tumors (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). In Class 1 tumors, PRAME expression was directly associated with SF3B1 mutations (P < 0.0001) and inversely associated with EIF1AX mutations (P = 0.004). PRAME expression was strongly associated with hypomethylation at 12 CpG sites near the PRAME promoter. MATERIALS AND

methodsAnalyses included PRAME mRNA expression, Class 1 versus Class 2 status, chromosomal copy number, mutation status of BAP1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ and SF3B1, and genomic DNA methylation status. Analyses were performed on 555 de-identified samples from Castle Biosciences, 123 samples from our center, and 80 samples from the TCGA.

conclusionsPRAME is aberrantly hypomethylated and activated in Class 1 and Class 2 uveal melanomas and is associated with increased metastatic risk in both classes. Since PRAME has been successfully targeted for immunotherapy, it may prove to be a companion prognostic biomarker.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAntigens, NeoplasmCarcinogenesisCell MovementDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMelanomaNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisRiskUveal MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmPRAME protein, humanchromosomal instabilityDNA methylationPRAMEpreferentially expressed antigen in melanomauveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID27486988
PMCPMC5312306
OpenAlexW2499451571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.