Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486853›Full record

ReviewCancer science2016

Oncolytic virus therapy: A new era of cancer treatment at dawn.

Hiroshi Fukuhara, Yasushi Ino, Tomoki Todo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 429 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
429citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
54.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

429 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 758 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Tuning epigenetics to enhance cancer virotherapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

369 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi FukuharaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi InoDivision of Innovative Cancer Therapy, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoki TodoDivision of Innovative Cancer Therapy, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. toudou-nsu@umin.ac.jp.
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic virus therapy is perhaps the next major breakthrough in cancer treatment following the success in immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors. Oncolytic viruses are defined as genetically engineered or naturally occurring viruses that selectively replicate in and kill cancer cells without harming the normal tissues. T-Vec (talimogene laherparepvec), a second-generation oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) armed with GM-CSF, was recently approved as the first oncolytic virus drug in the USA and Europe. The phase III trial proved that local intralesional injections with T-Vec in advanced malignant melanoma patients can not only suppress the growth of injected tumors but also act systemically and prolong overall survival. Other oncolytic viruses that are closing in on drug approval in North America and Europe include vaccinia virus JX-594 (pexastimogene devacirepvec) for hepatocellular carcinoma, GM-CSF-expressing adenovirus CG0070 for bladder cancer, and Reolysin (pelareorep), a wild-type variant of reovirus, for head and neck cancer. In Japan, a phase II clinical trial of G47∆, a third-generation oncolytic HSV-1, is ongoing in glioblastoma patients. G47∆ was recently designated as a "Sakigake" breakthrough therapy drug in Japan. This new system by the Japanese government should provide G47∆ with priority reviews and a fast-track drug approval by the regulatory authorities. Whereas numerous oncolytic viruses have been subjected to clinical trials, the common feature that is expected to play a major role in prolonging the survival of cancer patients is an induction of specific antitumor immunity in the course of tumor-specific viral replication. It appears that it will not be long before oncolytic virus therapy becomes a standard therapeutic option for all cancer patients.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyOncolytic VirotherapyAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicGenetic EngineeringGenetic VectorsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsOncolytic VirusesTreatment OutcomeClinical trialG47∆herpes simplex virusoncolytic immunotherapyoncolytic virus

Identifiers

PMID27486853
PMCPMC5084676
OpenAlexW2497822529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.