Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486822›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Bone marrow involvement identifies a subgroup of advanced Ewing sarcoma patients with fatal outcome irrespective of therapy in contrast to curable patients with multiple bone metastases but unaffected marrow.

Uwe Thiel, Angela Wawer, Irene von Luettichau, Hans-Ulrich Bender, Franziska Blaeschke, Thomas G P Grunewald, Marc Steinborn, Barbara Röper, Halvard Bonig, Thomas Klingebiel and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Uwe ThielDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Oncology Center, Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Städtisches Klinikum München und Klinikum rechts der Isar, Wilhelm Sander Sarcoma Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Angela WawerDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Oncology Center, Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Städtisches Klinikum München und Klinikum rechts der Isar, Wilhelm Sander Sarcoma Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Irene von LuettichauDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Oncology Center, Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Städtisches Klinikum München und Klinikum rechts der Isar, Wilhelm Sander Sarcoma Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich BenderDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Oncology Center, Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Städtisches Klinikum München und Klinikum rechts der Isar, Wilhelm Sander Sarcoma Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Franziska BlaeschkeDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Oncology Center, Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Städtisches Klinikum München und Klinikum rechts der Isar, Wilhelm Sander Sarcoma Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Thomas G P GrunewaldLaboratory for Pediatric Sarcoma Biology, Institute of Pathology, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Marc SteinbornDepartment of Radiology, Klinikum Schwabing, Städtisches Klinikum München, Munich, Germany.
Barbara RöperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Halvard BonigDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Thomas KlingebielDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Peter BaderDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ewa KoscielniakDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Michael PaulussenVestische Kinder- und Jugendklinik, Datteln, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany.
Uta DirksenDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
Heribert JuergensDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
Hans-Jochem KolbDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Oncology Center, Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Städtisches Klinikum München und Klinikum rechts der Isar, Wilhelm Sander Sarcoma Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Stefan E G BurdachDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Oncology Center, Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Städtisches Klinikum München und Klinikum rechts der Isar, Wilhelm Sander Sarcoma Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DEMünchen Klinik Schwabing · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEMünchen Klinik · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEOlgahospital · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdvanced Ewing sarcomas have poor prognosis. They are defined by early relapse (<24 months after diagnosis) and/or by metastasis to multiple bones or bone marrow (BM). We analyzed risk factors, toxicity and survival in advanced Ewing sarcoma patients treated with the MetaEICESS vs. EICESS92 protocols.

designOf 44 patients, 18 patients were enrolled into two subsequent MetaEICESS protocols between 1992 and 2014, and compared to outcomes of 26 advanced Ewing sarcoma patients treated with EICESS 1992 between 1992 and 1996. MetaEICESS 1992 consisted of induction chemotherapy, whole body imaging directed radiotherapy to the primary tumor and metastases, tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous rescue. In MetaEICESS 2007 this treatment was complemented by allogeneic stem cell transplantation. EICESS 1992 comprised induction chemotherapy, local therapy to the primary tumor only followed by consolidation chemotherapy.

resultsIn MetaEICESS 8/18 patients survived in complete remission vs. 2/26 in EICESS 1992 (p<0.05). Survival did not differ between MetaEICESS 2007 and MetaEICESS 1992. Three MetaEICESS patients died of complications, all in MetaEICESS 1992. After exclusion of patients succumbing to treatment related complications (n=3), 7/10 patients survived without BM involvement, in contrast to 0/5 patients with BM involvement. This was confirmed in a multivariate analysis. There was no correlation between BM involvement and the number of metastases at diagnosis.

conclusionThe MetaEICESS protocols yield long-term disease-free survival in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was not associated with increased death of complications. Bone marrow involvement is a risk factor distinct from multiple bone metastases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone MarrowBone NeoplasmsChildCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProspective StudiesRemission Inductionallogeneic stem cell transplantationbone marrow metastasisbone metastasisEwing sarcomahigh-dose chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27486822
PMCPMC5342601
OpenAlexW2497089950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.