Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486798›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Molecular Identification of Hookworm Isolates in Humans, Dogs and Soil in a Tribal Area in Tamil Nadu, India.

Santosh George, Bruno Levecke, Deepthi Kattula, Vasanthakumar Velusamy, Sheela Roy, Peter Geldhof, Rajiv Sarkar, Gagandeep Kang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence of Zoonotic Parasites and Genetic Diversity ofJournal of parasitology research · 2026
    Article
  5. The Canine HookwormPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of Ancylostoma caninum in Domestic Dogs from Ecuador via Various Techniques.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Santosh GeorgeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Bruno LeveckeDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Deepthi KattulaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Vasanthakumar VelusamyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Sheela RoyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Peter GeldhofDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Rajiv SarkarDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Gagandeep KangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INGhent University · BE

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/E/12/1/500750Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale) remain a major public health problem worldwide. Infections with hookworms (e.g., A. caninum, A. ceylanicum and A. braziliense) are also prevalent in dogs, but the role of dogs as a reservoir for zoonotic hookworm infections in humans needs to be further explored. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsAs part of an open-label community based cluster-randomized trial in a tribal area in Tamil Nadu (India; 2013-2015), a total of 143 isolates of hookworm eggs from human stool were speciated based on a previously described PCR-RFLP methodology. The presence of hookworm DNA was confirmed in 119 of 143 human samples. N. americanus (100%) was the most prevalent species, followed by A. caninum (16.8%) and A. duodenale (8.4%). Because of the high prevalence of A. caninum in humans, dog samples were also collected to assess the prevalence of A. caninum in dogs. In 68 out of 77 canine stool samples the presence of hookworms was confirmed using PCR-RFLP. In dogs, both A. caninum (76.4%) and A. ceylanicum (27.9%) were identified. Additionally, to determine the contamination of soil with zoonotic hookworm larvae, topsoil was collected from defecating areas. Hookworm DNA was detected in 72 out of 78 soil samples that revealed presence of hookworm-like nematode larvae. In soil, different hookworm species were identified, with animal hookworms being more prevalent (A. ceylanicum: 60.2%, A. caninum: 29.4%, A. duodenale: 16.6%, N. americanus: 1.4%, A. braziliense: 1.4%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In our study we regularly detected the presence of A. caninum DNA in the stool of humans. Whether this is the result of infection is currently unknown but it does warrant a closer look at dogs as a potential reservoir.

Indexed as

AncylostomatoideaAnimalsDNA, HelminthDogsFecesHookworm InfectionsHumansIndiaPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSoilSpecies SpecificityZoonosesDNA, HelminthSoil

Identifiers

PMID27486798
PMCPMC4972381
OpenAlexW2506543156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.