Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486758›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Circulating tumor cells: A promising marker of predicting tumor response in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy.

Wenjie Sun, Guichao Li, Juefeng Wan, Ji Zhu, Weiqi Shen, Zhen Zhang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07194616 (Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Surgery Alone on Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Stage II-III Rectal Cancer and Negative Circumferential Resection Margin), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07194616 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Surgery Alone on Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Stage II-III Rectal Cancer and Negative Circumferential Resection Margin: a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled120ConditionsRectal Cancer PatientsArmsPrimary Surgery, Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Potential value of detection of minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer following radical resection.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjie SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Guichao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Juefeng WanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Ji ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Weiqi ShenDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in assessing and predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

methodsA total of 115 patients with T3-4 and/or N+ rectal cancer were enrolled. All patients received neoadjuvant CRT followed by radical surgery after 6-8 weeks. The pathological results after surgery were evaluated according to tumor regression grade (TRG) classification.

resultsBased on TRG score, patients were classified as responders (TRG3-4) and non-responders (TRG0-2). The baseline CTC counts of responders were significantly higher than those of non-responders (44.50±11.94 vs. 37.67±15.45, P=0.012). By contrast, the post-CRT CTC counts of responders were significantly lower than those of non-responders (3.61±2.90 vs. 12.08±7.40, P<0.001). According to ROC analysis, Δ%CTC (percentage difference in CTC counts between baseline and post-CRT) was identified as the stronger predictor to discriminate responders from non-responders (AUC: 0.860). The results of multivariate analysis also indicated that post-CRT CTC counts and Δ%CTC were significantly and independently associated with tumor response to CRT.

conclusionsThe detection of CTCs is a powerful and promising tool for evaluating and predicting responses to neoadjuvant CRT in LARC patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsROC CurveTreatment Outcomecirculating tumor cellsneoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapypredictionrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID27486758
PMCPMC5342494
OpenAlexW2506308204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.