Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486661›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Tourniquet Test for Dengue Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Antonio Jose Grande, Hamish Reid, Emma Thomas, Charlie Foster, Thomas C Darton

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Eyes Cannot See What the Mind Does Not Know: Autochthonous Dengue in South Florida.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Rash and Fever in a Returned Traveler.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A review of dengue diagnostics and implications for surveillance and control.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Antonio Jose GrandeUniversidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciuma, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7182-075X
Hamish ReidNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Emma ThomasNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Charlie FosterNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Thomas C DartonDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue fever is a ubiquitous arboviral infection in tropical and sub-tropical regions, whose incidence has increased over recent decades. In the absence of a rapid point of care test, the clinical diagnosis of dengue is complex. The World Health Organisation has outlined diagnostic criteria for making the diagnosis of dengue infection, which includes the use of the tourniquet test (TT). PURPOSE: To assess the quality of the evidence supporting the use of the TT and perform a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis comparing the TT to antibody response measured by ELISA. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the following databases to April, 2016: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, BIOSIS, Web of Science, SCOPUS. STUDY SELECTION: Studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the tourniquet test with ELISA for the diagnosis of dengue were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent authors extracted data using a standardized form. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 16 studies with 28,739 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity for dengue diagnosis by TT was 58% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 43%-71%) and the specificity was 71% (95% CI, 60%-80%). In the subgroup analysis sensitivity for non-severe dengue diagnosis was 55% (95% CI, 52%-59%) and the specificity was 63% (95% CI, 60%-66%), whilst sensitivity for dengue hemorrhagic fever diagnosis was 62% (95% CI, 53%-71%) and the specificity was 60% (95% CI, 48%-70%). Receiver-operator characteristics demonstrated a test accuracy (AUC) of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.66-0.74).

conclusionThe tourniquet test is widely used in resource poor settings despite currently available evidence demonstrating only a marginal benefit in making a diagnosis of dengue infection alone. REGISTRATION: The protocol for this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO: CRD42015020323.

Indexed as

TourniquetsDengueDiagnosis, DifferentialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID27486661
PMCPMC4972435
OpenAlexW2478250039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.