Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486483›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2016

A quantitative measure of restricted and repetitive behaviors for early childhood.

Jason J Wolff, Brian A Boyd, Jed T Elison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cataloguing and characterizing interests in typically developing toddlers and toddlers who develop ASD.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2021
    Article
  18. Phenoscreening: a developmental approach to research domain criteria-motivated sampling.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason J WolffDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
Brian A BoydDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
Jed T ElisonInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.

Funding

Infant Brain and Behavioral Signatures of Later Emerging Risk for PsychopathologyR01MH104324 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Brain Imaging Markers of Response to Intervention in Toddlers with AutismK01MH101653 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WOLFF, JASON J · 2013 to 2017
$651k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH101653NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestricted and repetitive behaviors are characteristic phenotypic features of many neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurological conditions. During early childhood, such behaviors are considered normative. More research is needed to delineate the dimensions of restricted and repetitive behavior across typical and atypical development during this period.

methodsWe developed the 34-item parent-rated Repetitive Behavior Scale for Early Childhood (RBS-EC) to capture quantitative, dimensional features across a broad range of behaviors contributing to this domain. We evaluated its psychometric properties and factor structure in a community sample of 914 toddlers.

resultsThe RBS-EC showed excellent overall internal consistency (α = 0.90), strong test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.87 for topographies and 0.90 for frequency) and evidence of convergent and discriminative validity. Using a split-half approach to factor analysis, we identified that a three- or four-factor structure best fit the data and confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable fit for both models. The empirically derived four-factor model was consistent with our conceptual model and included repetitive motor, restricted interests and behavior, ritual and routine, and self-directed behavior.

conclusionsThis initial study indicates that the RBS-EC is a reliable and valid instrument for characterizing quantitative, dimensional aspects of restricted and repetitive behaviors in young children.

Indexed as

Circumscribed interestsMeasurementMotor stereotypyRepetitive behaviorRitualistic behaviorSelf-injurious behaviorToddlers

Identifiers

PMID27486483
PMCPMC4970296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.