Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486463›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

New Insights on Eggplant/Tomato/Pepper Synteny and Identification of Eggplant and Pepper Orthologous QTL.

Riccardo Rinaldi, Allen Van Deynze, Ezio Portis, Giuseppe L Rotino, Laura Toppino, Theresa Hill, Hamid Ashrafi, Lorenzo Barchi, Sergio Lanteri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fruit weight regulation by a paralog of Cell Size Regulator (CSR) in tomato and other crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-Wide Correlation of 36 Agronomic Traits in the 287 Pepper (International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Riccardo RinaldiDISAFA Plant Genetics and Breeding, University of TurinTurin, Italy; Seed Biotechnology Center, University of California, DavisDavis, CA, USA.
Allen Van DeynzeSeed Biotechnology Center, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Ezio PortisDISAFA Plant Genetics and Breeding, University of Turin Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe L RotinoCREA-ORL Research Unit for Vegetable Crops Montanaso Lombardo, Italy.
Laura ToppinoCREA-ORL Research Unit for Vegetable Crops Montanaso Lombardo, Italy.
Theresa HillSeed Biotechnology Center, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Hamid AshrafiSeed Biotechnology Center, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Lorenzo BarchiDISAFA Plant Genetics and Breeding, University of Turin Turin, Italy.
Sergio LanteriDISAFA Plant Genetics and Breeding, University of Turin Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITUniversity of California, Davis · USCereal Research Centre · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eggplant, pepper, and tomato are the most exploited berry-producing vegetables within the Solanaceae family. Their genomes differ in size, but each has 12 chromosomes which have undergone rearrangements causing a redistribution of loci. The genome sequences of all three species are available but differ in coverage, assembly quality and percentage of anchorage. Determining their syntenic relationship and QTL orthology will contribute to exploit genomic resources and genetic data for key agronomic traits. The syntenic analysis between tomato and pepper based on the alignment of 34,727 tomato CDS to the pepper genome sequence, identified 19,734 unique hits. The resulting synteny map confirmed the 14 inversions and 10 translocations previously documented, but also highlighted 3 new translocations and 4 major new inversions. Furthermore, each of the 12 chromosomes exhibited a number of rearrangements involving small regions of 0.5-0.7 Mbp. Due to high fragmentation of the publicly available eggplant genome sequence, physical localization of most eggplant QTL was not possible, thus, we compared the organization of the eggplant genetic map with the genome sequence of both tomato and pepper. The eggplant/tomato syntenic map confirmed all the 10 translocations but only 9 of the 14 known inversions; on the other hand, a newly detected inversion was recognized while another one was not confirmed. The eggplant/pepper syntenic map confirmed 10 translocations and 8 inversions already detected and suggested a putative new translocation. In order to perform the assessment of eggplant and pepper QTL orthology, the eggplant and pepper sequence-based markers located in their respective genetic map were aligned onto the pepper genome. GBrowse in pepper was used as reference platform for QTL positioning. A set of 151 pepper QTL were located as well as 212 eggplant QTL, including 76 major QTL (PVE ≥ 10%) affecting key agronomic traits. Most were confirmed to cluster in orthologous chromosomal regions. Our results highlight that the availability of genome sequences for an increasing number of crop species and the development of "ultra-dense" physical maps provide new and key tools for detailed syntenic and orthology studies between related plant species.

Indexed as

CDSchromosome rearrangementgene alignmentgenetic maporthologyQTL

Identifiers

PMID27486463
PMCPMC4948011
OpenAlexW2494008166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.