Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486436›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Microbial Community Responses to Increased Water and Organic Matter in the Arid Soils of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica.

Heather N Buelow, Ara S Winter, David J Van Horn, John E Barrett, Michael N Gooseff, Egbert Schwartz, Cristina D Takacs-Vesbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in Antarctic soil fungal research in the context of environmental changes.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Review
  7. Different microbial communities in paddy soils under organic and nonorganic farming.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic Insights Into theFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather N BuelowDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Ara S WinterDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA.
David J Van HornDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA.
John E BarrettDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Michael N GooseffDepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder Boulder, CO, USA.
Egbert SchwartzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Cristina D Takacs-VesbachDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The soils of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica are an extreme polar desert, inhabited exclusively by microscopic taxa. This region is on the threshold of anticipated climate change, with glacial melt, permafrost thaw, and the melting of massive buried ice increasing liquid water availability and mobilizing soil nutrients. Experimental water and organic matter (OM) amendments were applied to investigate how these climate change effects may impact the soil communities. To identify active taxa and their functions, total community RNA transcripts were sequenced and annotated, and amended soils were compared with unamended control soils using differential abundance and expression analyses. Overall, taxonomic diversity declined with amendments of water and OM. The domain Bacteria increased with both amendments while Eukaryota declined from 38% of all taxa in control soils to 8 and 11% in water and OM amended soils, respectively. Among bacterial phyla, Actinobacteria (59%) dominated water-amended soils and Firmicutes (45%) dominated OM amended soils. Three bacterial phyla (Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes) were primarily responsible for the observed positive functional responses, while eukaryotic taxa experienced the majority (27 of 34) of significant transcript losses. These results indicated that as climate changes in this region, a replacement of endemic taxa adapted to dry, oligotrophic conditions by generalist, copiotrophic taxa is likely.

Indexed as

amendmentsAntarcticametatranscriptomicsmicrobial ecologysoils in hyper-arid regions

Identifiers

PMID27486436
PMCPMC4947590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.