Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27486350›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine insights. Gastroenterology2016

Elderly Onset Celiac Disease: A Narrative Review.

Maria Cappello, Gaetano C Morreale, Anna Licata

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine insights. Gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06006468 (Evaluating ImmuNe Changes in the Evolution of Pre Type 1 Diabetes With Adult Onset), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06006468 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating ImmuNe Changes in the Evolution of Pre Type 1 Diabetes With Adult Onset

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustRan2023 to 2023Enrolled2,250ConditionsType 1 Diabetes, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Maturity OnsetArmsHigh genetic risk for type 1 diabetes, High gentic risk for Coeliac disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria CappelloGastroenterology and Hepatology Section, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo School of Medicine, Palermo, Italy.
Gaetano C MorrealeGastroenterology and Hepatology Section, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo School of Medicine, Palermo, Italy.
Anna LicataGastroenterology and Hepatology Section, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo School of Medicine, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac sprue is a chronic disease, which usually occurs in children and young adults. However, it can develop in any age group, and the prevalence is increasing even in the elderly population. The atypical patterns of clinical presentation in this age group sometimes can cause a delay in diagnosis. Given the lower sensitivity and specificity of serological tests in the aged population, clinical suspect often arises in the presence of complications (autoimmune disorders, fractures, and finally, malignancy) and must be supported by endoscopic and imaging tools. In this review, we highlight the incidence and prevalence of celiac disease in the elderly, the patterns of clinical presentation, diagnosis, and the most frequent complications, with the aim of increasing awareness and reducing the diagnostic delay of celiac disease even in the elderly population.

Indexed as

cardiovascular riskceliac diseaseelderlypresentations

Identifiers

PMID27486350
PMCPMC4965017
OpenAlexW2502562332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.