ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2016
Prediction of selective estrogen receptor beta agonist using open data and machine learning approach.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning and Large Language Models for Modeling Complex Toxicity Pathways and Predicting Steroidogenesis.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Enabled Structure-Based Drug Repurposing Approach to Identify Potential CYP1B1 Inhibitors.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Review ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Elucidation of Agonist and Antagonist Dynamic Binding Patterns in ER-α by Integration of Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Quantum Mechanical Calculations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.Environmental science & technology · 2020Article
- Towards accurate high-throughput ligand affinity prediction by exploiting structural ensembles, docking metrics and ligand similarity.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Development of QSAR machine learning-based models to forecast the effect of substances on malignant melanoma cells.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach Predicts Progesterone Receptor Antagonist Activity With High Performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2018Article
- Fructus Ligustri Lucidi modulates estrogen receptor expression with no uterotrophic effect in ovariectomized rats.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2018Article
- Development of estrogen receptor beta binding prediction model using large sets of chemicals.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstrogen receptors (ERs) are nuclear transcription factors that are involved in the regulation of many complex physiological processes in humans. ERs have been validated as important drug targets for the treatment of various diseases, including breast cancer, ovarian cancer, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease. ERs have two subtypes, ER-α and ER-β. Emerging data suggest that the development of subtype-selective ligands that specifically target ER-β could be a more optimal approach to elicit beneficial estrogen-like activities and reduce side effects.
methodsHerein, we focused on ER-β and developed its in silico quantitative structure-activity relationship models using machine learning (ML) methods.
resultsThe chemical structures and ER-β bioactivity data were extracted from public chemogenomics databases. Four types of popular fingerprint generation methods including MACCS fingerprint, PubChem fingerprint, 2D atom pairs, and Chemistry Development Kit extended fingerprint were used as descriptors. Four ML methods including Naïve Bayesian classifier, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, and support vector machine were used to train the models. The range of classification accuracies was 77.10% to 88.34%, and the range of area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve values was 0.8151 to 0.9475, evaluated by the 5-fold cross-validation. Comparison analysis suggests that both the random forest and the support vector machine are superior for the classification of selective ER-β agonists. Chemistry Development Kit extended fingerprints and MACCS fingerprint performed better in structural representation between active and inactive agonists.
conclusionThese results demonstrate that combining the fingerprint and ML approaches leads to robust ER-β agonist prediction models, which are potentially applicable to the identification of selective ER-β agonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.