Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485952›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2017

Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Emotion.

M Adamaszek, F D'Agata, R Ferrucci, C Habas, S Keulen, K C Kirkby, M Leggio, P Mariën, M Molinari, E Moulton and 8 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 308 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
308citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

308 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Maternal Prenatal Depressive Symptoms and Fetal Amygdala-Cerebellum Functional Connectivity.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Article

248 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

M AdamaszekDepartment of Clinical and Cognitive Neurorehabilitation, Klinik Bavaria Kreischa, An der Wolfsschlucht, 01731, Kreischa, Germany. michael.adamaszek@freenet.de.
F D'AgataDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
R FerrucciFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Granada, Italy.
C HabasService de NeuroImagerie (NeuroImaging department) Centre Hospitalier national D'Ophtalmologie des 15/20, Paris, France.
S KeulenDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Neurolinguistics, CLIEN, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
K C KirkbyPsychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
M LeggioI.R.C.C.S. Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
P MariënDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Neurolinguistics, CLIEN, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
M MolinariI.R.C.C.S. Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
E MoultonP.A.I.N. Group, Center for Pain and the Brain, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
L OrsiNeurologic Division 1, Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
F Van OverwalleFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
C PapadelisFetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
A PrioriFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Granada, Italy.
B SacchettiDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Physiology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
D J SchutterDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C StyliadisMedical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
J VerhoevenDepartment of Language and Communication Science, City University, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past three decades, insights into the role of the cerebellum in emotional processing have substantially increased. Indeed, methodological refinements in cerebellar lesion studies and major technological advancements in the field of neuroscience are in particular responsible to an exponential growth of knowledge on the topic. It is timely to review the available data and to critically evaluate the current status of the role of the cerebellum in emotion and related domains. The main aim of this article is to present an overview of current facts and ongoing debates relating to clinical, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological findings on the role of the cerebellum in key aspects of emotion. Experts in the field of cerebellar research discuss the range of cerebellar contributions to emotion in nine topics. Topics include the role of the cerebellum in perception and recognition, forwarding and encoding of emotional information, and the experience and regulation of emotional states in relation to motor, cognitive, and social behaviors. In addition, perspectives including cerebellar involvement in emotional learning, pain, emotional aspects of speech, and neuropsychiatric aspects of the cerebellum in mood disorders are briefly discussed. Results of this consensus paper illustrate how theory and empirical research have converged to produce a composite picture of brain topography, physiology, and function that establishes the role of the cerebellum in many aspects of emotional processing.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellumEmotionsHumansCerebellumEmotionLearningMoodNeurophysiologyNeurotopographyPainPerceptionProcessingRecognitionSpeech

Identifiers

PMID27485952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.