Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485737›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2016

Burden of Heart Failure in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.

Laith I Alshawabkeh, Alexander R Opotowsky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Medical Therapy for Heart Failure in Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Application of 4-D ultrasound-derived regional strain and proteomics analysis inAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characteristics of Adults With Congenital Heart Defects in the United States.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Autopsy in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD).Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laith I AlshawabkehDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, 02115, MA, USA.
Alexander R OpotowskyDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, 02115, MA, USA. alexander.opotowsky@tch.harvard.edu.
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients born with congenital heart disease (CHD) have benefited from remarkable advances in surgical and catheter-based interventions. As a result, the majority of children born with even the most complex forms of CHD live into adulthood. The specialized field of adult CHD (ACHD) was born out of the necessity to care for this new population of survivors of childhood CHD and their distinctive features. In this review, relevant aspects of ACHD that lead to, and are affected by, heart failure will be examined along with the increasing prevalence of HF in the burgeoning population of ACHD. We also highlight the challenges in defining HF in this particular group of patients.

Indexed as

AdultHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart FailureHumansPrevalenceSurvivorsAdult congenital heart diseaseEpidemiologyHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID27485737
OpenAlexW2503260671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.