Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485609›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2016

Providing mental health first aid in the workplace: a Delphi consensus study.

Nataly Bovopoulos, Anthony F Jorm, Kathy S Bond, Anthony D LaMontagne, Nicola J Reavley, Claire M Kelly, Betty A Kitchener, Angela Martin

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Rationale for Accreditation Criteria for the MATES in Construction Workplace Suicide Prevention Program.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Burnout syndrome and minor mental disorders in public employees.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nataly BovopoulosCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. natalyb@mhfa.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4957-3796
Anthony F JormCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Kathy S BondMental Health First Aid Australia, Level 6, 369 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Anthony D LaMontagneCentre for Population Health Research, School of Health & Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Nicola J ReavleyCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Claire M KellyMental Health First Aid Australia, Level 6, 369 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Betty A KitchenerMental Health First Aid Australia, Level 6, 369 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Angela MartinTasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 84, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
Deakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUMental Health Research Institute · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems are common in the workplace, but workers affected by such problems are not always well supported by managers and co-workers. Guidelines exist for the public on how to provide mental health first aid, but not specifically on how to tailor one's approach if the person of concern is a co-worker or employee. A Delphi consensus study was carried out to develop guidelines on additional considerations required when offering mental health first aid in a workplace context.

methodsA systematic search of websites, books and journal articles was conducted to develop a questionnaire with 246 items containing actions that someone may use to offer mental health first aid to a co-worker or employee. Three panels of experts from English-speaking countries were recruited (23 consumers, 26 managers and 38 workplace mental health professionals), who independently rated the items over three rounds for inclusion in the guidelines.

resultsThe retention rate of the expert panellists across the three rounds was 61.7 %. Of the 246 items, 201 items were agreed to be important or very important by at least 80 % of panellists. These 201 endorsed items included actions on how to approach and offer support to a co-worker, and additional considerations where the person assisting is a supervisor or manager, or is assisting in crisis situations such as acute distress.

conclusionsThe guidelines outline strategies for a worker to use when they are concerned about the mental health of a co-worker or employee. They will be used to inform future tailoring of Mental Health First Aid training when it is delivered in workplace settings and could influence organisational policies and procedures.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdultAgedDelphi TechniqueEmergency Services, PsychiatricFemaleFirst AidGuidelines as TopicHealth EducationHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedWorkplaceYoung AdultDelphi methodMental health first aidWorkplaceWorkplace guidelines

Identifiers

PMID27485609
PMCPMC4971664
OpenAlexW2498288866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.