Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485608›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Genome-wide characterization of non-reference transposons in crops suggests non-random insertion.

Bin Wei, Hanmei Liu, Xin Liu, Qianlin Xiao, Yongbin Wang, Junjie Zhang, Yufeng Hu, Yinghong Liu, Guowu Yu, Yubi Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AnPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mobile DNA · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bin WeiMaize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Hanmei LiuCollege of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, 625014, China.
Xin LiuBeijing Genome Institute and the Key Laboratory of Genomics of the Minister of Agriculture, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Qianlin XiaoMaize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Yongbin WangMaize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Junjie ZhangCollege of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, 625014, China.
Yufeng HuCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Yinghong LiuMaize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Guowu YuCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Yubi HuangMaize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China. yubihuang@sohu.com.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransposons (transposable elements or TEs) are DNA sequences that can change their position within the genome. A large number of TEs have been identified in reference genome of each crop(named accumulated TEs), which are the important part of genome. However, whether there existed TEs with different insert positions in resequenced crop accession genomes from those of reference genome (named non-reference transposable elements, non-ref TEs), and what the characteristics (such as the number, type and distribution) are. To identify and characterize crop non-ref TEs, we analyzed non-ref TEs in more than 125 accessions from rice (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) using resequenced data with paired-end mapping methods.

resultsWe identified 13,066, 23,866 and 35,679 non-ref TEs in rice, maize and sorghum, respectively. Genome-wide characterization analysis shows that most of non-ref TEs were unique and non-ref TE classes shows different among rice, maize and sorghum. We found that non-ref TEs have a strong positive correlation with gene number and have a bias toward insertion near genes, but with a preference for avoiding coding regions in maize and sorghum. The genes affected by non-ref TE insertion were functionally enriched for stress response mechanisms in all three crops.

conclusionsThese observations suggest that transposon insertion is not a random event and it makes genomic diversity, which may affect the intraspecific adaption and evolution of crops.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGenome, PlantMutagenesis, InsertionalChromosomes, PlantCrops, AgriculturalGene OntologyGenomicsDNA Transposable ElementsCropGenome-wide analysisNon-random insertionNon-reference transposonsStress response

Identifiers

PMID27485608
PMCPMC4971691
OpenAlexW2477297434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.