ArticleIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Phenotype guided characterization and molecular analysis of Indian patients with long QT syndromes.
Article in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole genome sequencing of families diagnosed with cardiac channelopathies reveals structural variants missed by whole exome sequencing.Journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing in Unexplained Intellectual Disability.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Long QT syndrome with potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 gene mutation mimicking refractory epilepsy: case report.BMC neurology · 2021Article
- An NGS-based genotyping in LQTS; minor genes are no longer minor.Journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Genotype and clinical characteristics of congenital long QT syndrome in Thailand.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalArticle
- Results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong QT syndromes (LQTS) are characterized by prolonged QTc interval on electrocardiogram (ECG) and manifest with syncope, seizures or sudden cardiac death. Long QT 1-3 constitute about 75% of all inherited LQTS. We classified a cohort of Indian patients for the common LQTS based on T wave morphology and triggering factors to prioritize the gene to be tested. We sought to identify the causative mutations and mutation spectrum, perform genotype-phenotype correlation and screen family members.
methodsThirty patients who fulfilled the criteria were enrolled. The most probable candidate gene among KCNQ1, KCNH2 and SCN5A were sequenced.
resultsOf the 30 patients, 22 were classified at LQT1, two as LQT2 and six as LQT3. Mutations in KCNQ1 were identified in 17 (77%) of 22 LQT1 patients, KCNH2 mutation in one of two LQT2 and SCN5A mutations in two of six LQT3 patients. We correlated the presence of the specific ECG morphology in all mutation positive cases. Eight mutations in KCNQ1 and one in SCN5A were novel and predicted to be pathogenic by in-silico analysis. Of all parents with heterozygous mutations, 24 (92%) of 26 were asymptomatic. Ten available siblings of nine probands were screened and three were homozygous and symptomatic, five heterozygous and asymptomatic.
conclusionsThis study in a cohort of Asian Indian patients highlights the mutation spectrum of common Long QT syndromes. The clinical utility for prevention of unexplained sudden cardiac deaths is an important sequel to identification of the mutation in at-risk family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.