ArticleAMB Express2016
Transcriptomes of a xylose-utilizing industrial flocculating Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain cultured in media containing different sugar sources.
Article in AMB Express, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory mechanism of Haa1p and Hap4p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to mixed acetic acid and formic acid when fermenting mixed glucose and xylose.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Glucose receptor deletion and engineering: impact on xylose sensing and utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.FEMS yeast research · 2025Article
- Response mechanisms of different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to succinic acid.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Using phosphoglucose isomerase-deficient (pgi1Δ) Saccharomyces cerevisiae to map the impact of sugar phosphate levels on D-glucose and D-xylose sensing.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- Regulatory mechanism of Haa1p and Tye7p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae when fermenting mixed glucose and xylose with or without inhibitors.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- Activation of cryptic xylose metabolism by a transcriptional activator Znf1 boosts up xylitol production in the engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking xylose suppressor BUD21 gene.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- D-Xylose Sensing inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Improving Acetic Acid and Furfural Resistance of Xylose-Fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains by Regulating Novel Transcription Factors Revealed via Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Transcription Analysis of RecombinantJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Signature pathway expression of xylose utilization in the genetically engineered industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.PloS one · 2018Article
- Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a refactored xylose-utilizingBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lignocellulosic hydrolysates used for bioethanol production contain a mixture of sugars, with xylose being the second most abundant after glucose. Since xylose is not a natural substrate for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, recombinant S. cerevisiae strongly prefers glucose over xylose, and the fermentation rate and ethanol yield with xylose are both lower than those with glucose. To determine the molecular basis for glucose and xylose fermentation, we used microarrays to investigate the transcriptional difference of a xylose-utilizing industrial strain cultured in both single sugar media and a mixed sugar medium of glucose and xylose. The transcriptomes were nearly identical between glucose metabolizing cells in the glucose alone medium and those in the glucose fermentation phase in the mixed-sugar medium. Whereas the transcriptomes highly differed between the xylose metabolizing cells in the xylose alone medium and those in the xylose fermentation phase in the mixed sugar medium, and the differences mainly involved sulfur metabolism. When the transcriptional profiles were compared between glucose fermentation state and xylose fermentation state, we found the expression patterns of hexose transporters and glucose signaling pathway differed in response to different sugar sources, and the expression levels of the genes involved in gluconeogenesis, the glyoxylate and tricarboxylic acid cycles and respiration increased with xylose, indicating that the xylose-metabolizing cells had high requirements for maintenance energy and lacked the carbon catabolite repression capability. The effect of carbon catabolite repression by glucose lasted after glucose depletion for specific genes to different extents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.