Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485475›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA2016

Identifying fusion transcripts using next generation sequencing.

Shailesh Kumar, Sundus Khalid Razzaq, Angie Duy Vo, Mamta Gautam, Hui Li

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. PFGPred: a stack ensemble classifier for the identification of fusion genes in plants.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Protocol for the Detection of Fusion Transcripts Using RNA-Sequencing Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. TargetedCell reports methods · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Novel read-through fusion transcript Bcl2l2-Pabpn1 in glioblastoma cells.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shailesh KumarDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Sundus Khalid RazzaqDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Angie Duy VoDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Mamta GautamDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Hui LiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. hl9r@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Induction of Gene Fusions by Pre-Existing Chimeric TranscriptsR01CA190713 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LI, HUI · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusion transcripts (i.e., chimeric RNAs) resulting from gene fusions have been used successfully for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic applications. In addition, many fusion transcripts are found in normal human cell lines and tissues, with some data supporting their role in normal physiology. Besides chromosomal rearrangement, intergenic splicing can generate them. Global identification of fusion transcripts becomes possible with the help of next generation sequencing technology like RNA-Seq. In the past decade, major advancements have been made for chimeric RNA discovery due to the development of advanced sequencing platform and software packages. However, current software tools behave differently in terms of specificity, sensitivity, time, and computational memory usage. Recent benchmarking studies showed that none of the tools are inclusive. The development of high performance (accurate and fast), and user-friendly fusion detection tool/pipeline is still an open quest. In this article, we review the existing software packages for fusion detection. We explain the methods of the tools, and discuss various factors that affect fusion detection. We summarize conclusions drawn from several comparative studies, and then discuss some of the pitfalls of these studies. We also describe the limitations of current tools, and suggest directions for future development. WIREs RNA 2016, 7:811-823. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1382 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene FusionAnimalsComputer SimulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID27485475
PMCPMC5065767
OpenAlexW2516427586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.