Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485324›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2016

Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre.

Nigel Glynn, Mark J Hannon, Sarah Lewis, Patrick Hillery, Mohammed Al-Mousa, Arnold D K Hill, Frank Keeling, Martina Morrin, Christopher J Thompson, Diarmuid Smith and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nigel GlynnDepartment of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Mark J HannonDepartment of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Sarah LewisDepartment of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Patrick HilleryDepartment of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Mohammed Al-MousaDepartment of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Arnold D K HillDepartment of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Frank KeelingDepartment Radiology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Martina MorrinDepartment Radiology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Christopher J ThompsonDepartment of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Diarmuid SmithDepartment of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Derval RoystonDepartment of Pathology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Mary LeaderDepartment of Pathology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Amar AghaDepartment of Endocrinology, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI Medical School, Dublin 9, Ireland. amaragha@beaumont.ie.
Beaumont Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the tool of choice for evaluating thyroid nodules with the majority classified as benign following initial assessment. However, concern remains about false negative results and some guidelines have recommended routine repeat aspirates. We aimed to assess the utility of routine repeat FNAB for nodules classified as benign on initial biopsy and to examine the impact of establishing a multidisciplinary team for the care of these patients.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of 400 consecutive patients (413 nodules) who underwent FNAB of a thyroid nodule at our hospital between July 2008 and July 2011. Data recorded included demographic, clinical, histological and radiological variables.

resultsThree hundred and fifty seven patients (89 %) were female. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. Two hundred and fifty eight (63 %) nodules were diagnosed as benign. The rate of routine repeat biopsy increased significantly over the time course of the study (p for trend = 0.012). Nine Thy 2 nodules were classified differently on the basis of routine repeat biopsy; one patient was classified as malignant on repeat biopsy and was diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eight were classified as a follicular lesions on repeat biopsy-six diagnosed as benign following lobectomy; two declined lobectomy and were followed radiologically with no nodule size increase.

conclusionsThe false negative rate of an initial benign cytology result, from a thyroid nodule aspirate, is low. In the setting of an experienced multidisciplinary thyroid team, routine repeat aspiration is not justified.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Fine-NeedleFalse Negative ReactionsHumansIrelandPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleTime FactorsFine needle aspirationThyroid cytologyThyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID27485324
PMCPMC4969652
OpenAlexW2488695704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.