Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485241›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Antenatal care use in urban areas in two European countries: Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Jana Vanden Broeck, Esther Feijen-de Jong, Trudy Klomp, Koen Putman, Katrien Beeckman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jana Vanden BroeckOrganisation, Policy and social Inequalities in Health care (OPIH), Department of Medical Sociology and Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Esther Feijen-de JongDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Groningen and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Trudy KlompDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Groningen and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Koen PutmanOrganisation, Policy and social Inequalities in Health care (OPIH), Department of Medical Sociology and Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Katrien BeeckmanOrganisation, Policy and social Inequalities in Health care (OPIH), Department of Medical Sociology and Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. katrien.beeckman@uzbrussel.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExamining determinants of antenatal care (ANC) is important to stimulate equitable distribution of ANC across Europe. This study (1) compares ANC utilisation in Belgium and the Netherlands and (2) identifies predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants.

methodsSecondary data analysis is performed using data from Belgium, and the Netherlands. The content and timing of care during pregnancy (CTP) tool measured ANC use. Non-parametric tests and ordinal logistic regression are performed to gain insight in the determinants of health care use.

resultsDutch women receive appropriate ANC more often than Belgian women. Multivariate analysis showed that lower education, unemployment, lower continuity of care and non-attendance of antenatal classes are associated with a lower likelihood of having more appropriate ANC.

conclusionsPredisposing and pregnancy related variables are most important to influence the content and timing of ANC, irrespective of the country women live in. Lower health literacy in socially vulnerable women might explain the predisposing determinants of health care use in both countries. Stimulating accessibility to antenatal courses or organising public education are recommendations for practice. Regarding pregnancy-related determinants, improving continuity of care can optimise ANC use in both countries.

Indexed as

Urban PopulationAdultBelgiumEthnicityFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsNetherlandsPregnancyPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID27485241
PMCPMC4970209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.