Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485127›Full record

ReviewBMC medical informatics and decision making2016

Determinants of a successful problem list to support the implementation of the problem-oriented medical record according to recent literature.

Sereh M J Simons, Felix H J M Cillessen, Jan A Hazelzet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06002685 (Effects of Attachment-Based Intervention on Low-Income Latino Children's Emerging Health Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06002685 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Attachment-Based Intervention on Low-Income Latino Children's Emerging Health Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2023 to 2028Enrolled260ConditionsRespiratory Disease, Inflammation, Insufficient Sleep, Digestive DiseaseArmsAttachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up, Home-Based Book-of-the-Week
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How to Assess Health Gains.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Overview of Physical Activity Counseling in Primary Care.Korean journal of family medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of a problem-oriented view on clinical data retrieval.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Problems with the problem list: challenges of transparency in an era of patient curation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sereh M J SimonsDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.m.j.simons@gmail.com.
Felix H J M CillessenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan A HazelzetDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA problem-oriented approach is one of the possibilities to organize a medical record. The problem-oriented medical record (POMR) - a structured organization of patient information per presented medical problem- was introduced at the end of the sixties by Dr. Lawrence Weed to aid dealing with the multiplicity of patient problems. The problem list as a precondition is the centerpiece of the problem-oriented medical record (POMR) also called problem-oriented record (POR). Prior to the digital era, paper records presented a flat list of medical problems to the healthcare professional without the features that are possible with current technology. In modern EHRs a POMR based on a structured problem list can be used for clinical decision support, registries, order management, population health, and potentially other innovative functionality in the future, thereby providing a new incentive to the implementation and use of the POMR.

methodsOn both 12 May 2014 and 1 June 2015 a systematic literature search was conducted. From the retrieved articles statements regarding the POMR and related to successful or non-successful implementation, were categorized. Generic determinants were extracted from these statements.

resultsIn this research 38 articles were included. The literature analysis led to 12 generic determinants: clinical practice/reasoning, complete and accurate problem list, data structure/content, efficiency, functionality, interoperability, multi-disciplinary, overview of patient information, quality of care, system support, training of staff, and usability.

conclusionsTwo main subjects can be distinguished in the determinants: the system that the problem list and POMR is integrated in and the organization using that system. The combination of the two requires a sociotechnical approach and both are equally important for successful implementation of a POMR. All the determinants have to be taken into account, but the weight given to each of the determinants depends on the organizationusing the problem list or POMR.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMedical Records, Problem-OrientedElectronic Health RecordImplementationProblem-oriented medical recordReview

Identifiers

PMID27485127
PMCPMC4970280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.