Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27485046›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2016

Modification of cerebral vascular anatomy induced by Leo stent placement depending on the site of stenting: A series of 102 cases.

Y Chau, L Mondot, M Sachet, J Gaudart, D Fontaine, M Lonjon, J Sédat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predisposing factors for the deformation of parent artery of anterior circulation saccular aneurysm after stent-assisted embolization: A retrospective cohort study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Y ChauUniversity Teaching Hospital of Nice, Pasteur Hospital, Radiology Department, Neural Intervention Unit, France chau.y@chu-nice.fr.
L MondotUniversity Teaching Hospital of Nice, Pasteur Hospital, Radiology Department, Neural Intervention Unit, France.
M SachetUniversity Teaching Hospital of Nice, Pasteur Hospital, Radiology Department, Neural Intervention Unit, France.
J GaudartLa Timone Hospital, Public Health and Medical Information Department, University Teaching Hospital of Marseilles, France.
D FontaineUniversity Teaching Hospital of Nice, Neurosurgery Department, France.
M LonjonUniversity Teaching Hospital of Nice, Neurosurgery Department, France.
J SédatUniversity Teaching Hospital of Nice, Pasteur Hospital, Radiology Department, Neural Intervention Unit, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRecent studies demonstrated the capacity of stents to modify cerebral vascular anatomy. This study evaluates arterial anatomy deformation after Leo stent placement according to the stenting site and the impact on the immediate postoperative and six-month degree of aneurysmal occlusion. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 102 stents were placed against the neck of aneurysms situated in the anterior cerebral circulation. Aneurysms were classified into two groups: The first was called the distal group (n = 62) and comprised aneurysms situated in the middle cerebral and anterior communicating arteries and the second was called the proximal group (n = 40) and comprised aneurysms in other sites. The stented arterial segment was classified as deformed or non-deformed by blinded review and superimposition of anonymised films before and after stenting. The degree of occlusion was determined immediately postoperatively and at six months.

resultsSignificantly, anatomical deformity was observed in the distal group compared to the proximal group (85% vs 28%). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative degree of occlusion. At six months, a significant difference was observed between the two groups: three recurrences in the distal group vs 10 recurrences in the proximal group. Two (3%) recurrences were observed in the deformed group vs 11 (31%) recurrences in the non-deformed group.

conclusionsArterial deformity induced by stenting is even more marked for distal aneurysms. The recurrence rate is smaller when the stent placement results in an arterial anatomical change. The percentage of recurrence is lower when anatomy was amended by stent implantation.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedAneurysm, RupturedAnterior Cerebral ArteryCerebral AngiographyCerebral ArteriesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryPosterior Cerebral ArteryRecurrenceAneurysmhaemodynamicintracranialstent

Identifiers

PMID27485046
PMCPMC5564358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.