ArticleInsights into imaging2016
Characteristics and trends in publication of scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology: a comparison between 2000 and 2010.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Oral Presentation to Publication: Outcomes of CIRSE 2021-2022 Abstracts.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- From abstract to article: Publication outcomes of oral presentations at the ESNR congresses between 2018 and 2022.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- The journey from congress to journal: publication patterns of ECR 2019 oral presentations.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- From congress to journal: publication outcomes of oral scientific presentations at the European society of urogenital radiology congresses.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Publication characteristics of oral presentations at the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology congresses.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Publication outcome of research presented at the European Congress of Endocrinology: a web scraping-based analysis and critical appraisal.Endocrine · 2021Article
- Publication bias in diagnostic imaging: conference abstracts with positive conclusions are more likely to be published.European radiology · 2020Article
- Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication.European radiology · 2018Article
- The Impact of Non-Brazilian Contribution on the Publishing Performance of Psychology Journals in Brazil.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine journal publication rates of scientific papers presented orally at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2010, with comparison of country data to ECR 2000.
methodsAll oral presentations from ECR 2010 were evaluated for publication between 2010 and 2014 using the MEDLINE database. Countries, collaborations, subspecialties, modalities and study design were ranked by publication percentage. Chi-square tests were used to compare publication percentages for each category of variables. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for each country relative to the host nation, Austria. ECR 2010 country statistics were compared with analogous data from ECR 2000.
resultsIn total, 360/840 abstracts were subsequently published (43 %). The author's country of origin (p = 0.02), subspecialty (p = 0.02) and study design (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with subsequent publication. Switzerland, the Netherlands, France and Germany were among the top six countries by publication percentage in 2000 and 2010. In 2010, Switzerland had the highest publication rate (62 %) and HR in comparison to Austria (HR 2.62 [1.31-5.25], p = 0.01). Three Asian nations increased relative publication rates over the 10-year period.
conclusionSeveral European nations consistently convert relatively high percentages of oral abstracts at ECR into publications, and the influence of Asian countries is increasing. MAIN MESSAGES: • Certain European nations consistently publish high percentages of orally presented abstracts at ECR. • The influence of several Asian countries on ECR is increasing. • Country, subspecialty and study design are significantly associated with journal publication. • Authors collaborating internationally have the highest publication rates and mean impact factors. • Among all modalities, PET-CT, MRI and CT have the highest publication percentages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.