Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27484746›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2017

The Medina Embolic Device: early clinical experience from a single center.

Marta Aguilar Perez, Pervinder Bhogal, Rosa Martinez Moreno, Hansjörg Bäzner, Oliver Ganslandt, Hans Henkes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Will Coiling Survive through the Next Decade?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. pCONUS 2 and pCONUS 2-HPC for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: Periprocedural, 6-month, and early 2-year follow-up outcomes.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  11. The Woven EndoBridge for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Results in 95 aneurysms from a single center.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Medina Embolic Device: Karolinska experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2018
    Article
  18. [Management of paraophthalmic aneurysms : Review of endovascular treatment strategies].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta Aguilar PerezKlinik für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Pervinder BhogalInterventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Rosa Martinez MorenoDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Hansjörg BäznerKlinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Bürgerhospital, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Oliver GanslandtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Hans HenkesKlinik für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Klinikum Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report our initial experience with the Medina Embolic Device (MED) in unruptured intracranial aneurysms either as sole treatment or in conjunction with additional devices.

methods15 consecutive patients (6 women, 9 men) with unruptured aneurysms were treated between September 2015 and April 2016. The aneurysm fundus measured at least 5 mm. We evaluated the angiographic appearances of treated aneurysms at the end of the procedure and at follow-up, the clinical status, complications, and requirement for adjunctive devices.

resultsThe MED was successfully deployed in all but one case and adjunctive devices were required in 10 cases. Aneurysm locations were middle cerebral artery bifurcation (n=3), internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation (n=1), supraclinoid ICA (n=5), posterior communicating artery (n=1), anterior communicating artery (n=2), cavernous ICA (n=2), distal basilar sidewall (n=1), basilar tip (n=1). Three patients had complications although none could be attributed to the MED. Immediate angiographic results were modified Raymond-Roy classification (mRRC) I=1, mRRC II=5, mRRC IIIa=3, mRRC IIIb=5, and one patient showed contrast stasis within the fundus of the aneurysm. Follow-up angiography was available in 11 patients, with four showing complete aneurysm exclusion, six with stable remnants and one patient with an enlarging neck remnant.

conclusionsThe MED represents a major step forward in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. It can result in rapid exclusion of an aneurysm from the circulation and has a good safety profile. We believe that the true value of the MED will be in combining its use with adjunctive devices such as endoluminal flow diverters that will result in rapid aneurysmal exclusion.

Indexed as

AgedAnterior Cerebral ArteryCarotid Artery, InternalCerebral AngiographyCircle of WillisEmbolismEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryTreatment OutcomeAneurysmCoilFlow Diverter

Identifiers

PMID27484746
PMCPMC5264237
OpenAlexW2484797898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.