Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27484683›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2016

A co-design process developing heuristics for practitioners providing end of life care for people with dementia.

Nathan Davies, Rammya Mathew, Jane Wilcock, Jill Manthorpe, Elizabeth L Sampson, Kethakie Lamahewa, Steve Iliffe

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Co-design development of a decision guide on eating and drinking for people with severe dementia during acute hospital admissions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. A decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end-of-life: Coproduction process, outcome and reflections.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Family Carer Involvement in Dementia Care Research: A Scoping Review and Expert Consultation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Co-Designing a Palliative Dementia Care Framework to Support Holistic Assessment and Decision Making: The EMBED-Care Framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Patterns of Service Provision in Older People's Mental Health Care in Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A qualitative study exploring the difficulties influencing decision making at the end of life for people with dementia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan DaviesResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. Nathan.davies.10@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7757-5353
Rammya MathewResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Jane WilcockResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Jill ManthorpeSocial Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, WC2B 6NR, UK.
Elizabeth L SampsonDivision of Psychiatry, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Kethakie LamahewaResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Steve IliffeResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.

Funding

Alzheimer's Society 204Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-UMarie Curie MCCC-FPR-11-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe end of life for someone with dementia can present many challenges for practitioners; such as, providing care if there are swallowing difficulties. This study aimed to develop a toolkit of heuristics (rules-of-thumb) to aid practitioners making end-of-life care decisions for people with dementia.

methodsAn iterative co-design approach was adopted using a literature review and qualitative methods, including; 1) qualitative interviews and focus groups with family carers and 2) focus groups with health and care professionals. Family carers were recruited from a national charity, purposively sampling those with experience of end-of-life care for a person with dementia. Health and care professionals were purposively sampled to include a broad range of expertise including; general practitioners, palliative care specialists, and geriatricians. A co-design group was established consisting of health and social care experts and family carers, to synthesise the findings from the qualitative work and produce a toolkit of heuristics to be tested in practice.

resultsFour broad areas were identified as requiring complex decisions at the end of life; 1) eating/swallowing difficulties, 2) agitation/restlessness, 3) ending life-sustaining treatment, and 4) providing "routine care" at the end of life. Each topic became a heuristic consisting of rules arranged into flowcharts. Eating/swallowing difficulties have three rules; ensuring eating/swallowing difficulties do not come as a surprise, considering if the situation is an emergency, and considering 'comfort feeding' only versus time-trialled artificial feeding. Agitation/restlessness encourages a holistic approach, considering the environment, physical causes, and the carer's wellbeing. Ending life-sustaining treatment supports practitioners through a process of considering the benefits of treatment versus quality-of-life and comfort. Finally, a heuristic on providing routine care such as bathing, prompts practitioners to consider adapting the delivery of care, in order to promote comfort and dignity at the end of life.

conclusionsThe heuristics are easy to use and remember, offering a novel approach to decision making for dementia end-of-life care. They have the potential to be used alongside existing end-of-life care recommendations, adding more readily available practical assistance. This is the first study to synthesise experience and existing evidence into easy-to-use heuristics for dementia end-of-life care.

Indexed as

HeuristicsAdvance Care PlanningCaregiversChildClinical Decision-MakingClinical ProtocolsDecision TreesDementiaFocus GroupsHumansPalliative CarePractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of LifeTerminal CareUnited KingdomCo-designDementiaEnd-of-life carePalliative careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID27484683
PMCPMC4969644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.