Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27484494›Full record

ReviewHerz2016

[Chronic coronary occlusions : When and how should revascularization be performed?]

K Mashayekhi, H J Büttner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K MashayekhiInterventionelle Kardiologie, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie II, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, Südring 15, 79189, Bad Krozingen, Deutschland. kambis.mashayekhi@universitaets-herzzentrum.de.
H J BüttnerInterventionelle Kardiologie, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie II, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, Südring 15, 79189, Bad Krozingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic occlusion of coronary arteries also known as chronic total occlusions (CTO) are found in approximately 20 % of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and in approximately 50 % of patients after coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). As a result of technical advancements in retrograde recanalization techniques specialized centers can now achieve success rates of over 85 %, regardless of the CTO anatomy. Given the complexity of retrograde CTO techniques, a consensus paper issued by the Euro CTO Club requires interventional cardiologists to have sufficient experience in antegrade approaches (>300 antegrade CTO cases and >50 per year) with an additional training program (25 retrograde cases each as first and second operating surgeon) before becoming a qualified independent retrograde surgeon. The increased investment in time and technical resources can only be justified if the patient has a clear clinical benefit. This technical advancement and the progressively clearer evidence that complete revascularization can be achieved in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease have attracted growing interest in recent years from interventional cardiologists in the recanalization of CTO.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicBlood Vessel ProsthesisCardiologyChronic DiseaseCoronary StenosisGermanyHumansMyocardial RevascularizationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionStentsChronic coronary occlusionComplete revascularizationCoronary artery bypassPercutaneous coronary interventionRetrograde CTO techniques

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.