Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27484002›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

An exploration of men's experiences of undergoing active surveillance for favourable-risk prostate cancer: A mixed methods study protocol.

Eimear Ruane-McAteer, Joe O'Sullivan, Sam Porter, Lionne Venderbos, Gillian Prue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Long-term follow-up after active surveillance or curative treatment: quality-of-life outcomes of men with low-risk prostate cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eimear Ruane-McAteerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland. eruanemcateer01@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1669-218X
Joe O'SullivanThe Northern Ireland Cancer Centre (NICC), Belfast City Hospital, 51 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Sam PorterSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland.
Lionne VenderbosDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gillian PrueSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland.
Queen's University Belfast · GBErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is one of the most common male cancers worldwide. Active Surveillance (AS) has been developed to allow men with lower risk disease to postpone or avoid the adverse side effects associated with curative treatments until the disease progresses. Despite the medical benefits of AS, it is reported that living with untreated cancer can create a significant emotional burden for patients. METHODS/

designThe aim of this study is to gain insight into the experiences of men eligible to undergo AS for favourable-risk PCa. This study has a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design consisting of two phases: quantitative followed by qualitative. Phase 1 has a multiple point, prospective, longitudinal exploratory design. Ninety men diagnosed with favourable-risk prostate cancer will be assessed immediately post-diagnosis (baseline) and followed over a period of 12 months, in intervals of 3 month. Ninety age-matched men with no cancer diagnosis will also be recruited using peer nomination and followed up in the same 3 month intervals. Following completion of Phase 1, 10-15 AS participants who have reported both the best and worst psychological functioning will be invited to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Phase 2 will facilitate further exploration of the quantitative results and obtain a richer understanding of participants' personal interpretations of their illness and psychological wellbeing. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to utilise early baseline measures; include a healthy comparison group; calculate sample size through power calculations; and use a mixed methods approach to gain a deeper more holistic insight into the experiences of men diagnosed with favourable-risk prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePeer GroupPopulation SurveillanceProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSample SizeActive surveillanceAnxietyDepressionMixed methodsProstate cancerPsychological adjustmentQuality of lifeUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID27484002
PMCPMC4971725
OpenAlexW2501441865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.