Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27483353›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2016

YBR/EiJ mice: a new model of glaucoma caused by genes on chromosomes 4 and 17.

K Saidas Nair, Mihai Cosma, Narayanan Raghupathy, Michael A Sellarole, Nicholas G Tolman, Wilhelmine de Vries, Richard S Smith, Simon W M John

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Absence of Glaucoma in Tg-MYOCY437H Mice of Diverse Genetic Backgrounds.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K Saidas NairDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, USA The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Mihai CosmaThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Narayanan RaghupathyThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Michael A SellaroleDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Nicholas G TolmanThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Wilhelmine de VriesThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Richard S SmithThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Simon W M JohnThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA simon.john@jax.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4319-0356
Jackson Laboratory · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USTufts University · US

Funding

Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAKKARAJU, APARNA · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
Factors Determining Intraocular Pressure and Glaucoma SusceptibilityR01EY011721 · NEI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI JOHN, SIMON W · 2002 to 2018
$12.4M
Determining Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of GlaucomaR01EY022891 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NAIR, KAYARAT SAIDAS · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
FACTORS DETERMINING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURER29EY011721 · NEI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI JOHN, SIMON W · 1997 to 2001
$227k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011721NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022891NEI NIH HHS R29 EY011721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of inherited animal models with different genetic causes and distinct genetic backgrounds are needed to help dissect the complex genetic etiology of glaucoma. The scarcity of such animal models has hampered progress in glaucoma research. Here, we introduce a new inherited glaucoma model: the inbred mouse strain YBR/EiJ (YBR). YBR mice develop a form of pigmentary glaucoma. They exhibit a progressive age-related pigment-dispersing iris disease characterized by iris stromal atrophy. Subsequently, these mice develop elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma. Genetic mapping studies utilizing YBR as a glaucoma-susceptible strain and C57BL/6J as a glaucoma-resistant strain were performed to identify genetic loci responsible for the iris disease and high IOP. A recessive locus linked to Tyrp1(b) on chromosome 4 contributes to iris stromal atrophy and high IOP. However, this is not the only important locus. A recessive locus on YBR chromosome 17 causes high IOP independent of the iris stromal atrophy. In specific eyes with high IOP caused by YBR chromosome 17, the drainage angle (through which ocular fluid leaves the eye) is largely open. The YBR alleles of genes on chromosomes 4 and 17 underlie the development of high IOP and glaucoma but do so through independent mechanisms. Together, these two loci act in an additive manner to increase the susceptibility of YBR mice to the development of high IOP. The chromosome 17 locus is important not only because it causes IOP elevation in mice with largely open drainage angles but also because it exacerbates IOP elevation and glaucoma induced by pigment dispersion. Therefore, YBR mice are a valuable resource for studying the genetic etiology of IOP elevation and glaucoma, as well as for testing new treatments.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAnimalsAtrophyChromosomes, MammalianCorneal StromaDisease Models, AnimalGlaucomaIntraocular PressureIris DiseasesMice, Inbred C57BLNerve DegenerationPigmentationQuantitative Trait LociGeneticsGlaucomaMouse modelOcular diseases

Identifiers

PMID27483353
PMCPMC5007977
OpenAlexW2418812484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.